User talk:KristofferR

Fischer Random Chess
Hi -- thanks for updating the name of the variant to "Fischer Random Chess" at FIDE World Fischer Random Chess Championship 2019 after the corresponding page was moved. There's still one instance of "Chess960" left in the article (in the section Semifinals and finals) -- did you leave that in on purpose because the name "Fischer Random Chess" wasn't official yet at the time? While many articles published at the time call it the Chess960 championship, note that on the poster behind Magnus and Hikaru in the photos in this article it already says "Fischer Random".

The same question also arises with respect to the article on the World Chess960 Championship (which is both about the previous unofficial championships, including the one in 2018, and about the FIDE World Fischer Random Chess Championship 2019).

Joriki (talk) 17:09, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

- Yeah, I left it like that because I wasn't sure how to handle it. Feel free to do what you feel is correct. (KristofferR (talk) 19:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC))

DS alert
QuackGuru ( talk ) 15:11, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Would advise you self revert... Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 04:44, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Dubious motivations behind that advise, considering you only posted this edit war alert to my talk page, and not to QuackGurus, despite him receiving administrative bans for 6 months for disruptive editing of the e-cigarette field. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:QuackGuru/Archive_4#Topic_ban_2 KristofferR (talk) 05:24, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicotine pouch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian Directorate for Health ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nicotine_pouch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nicotine_pouch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Spam and mass failed verification content
Please fix the issues or I will be forced to revert back to the version before the problems were introduced. QuackGuru ( talk ) 15:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

I responded to your bogus argument of trolling. QuackGuru ( talk ) 16:45, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Song of the South
Your recent editing history at Song of the South shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Nicotine pouches
Hello, I saw you tried to improve the nicotine pouch article. I don't want to interrupt your work, somehow. I just took “more encyclopedic pictures“ of nicotine pouches. You can add them if you want. Pictures can be found on the Czech wikipedia if you agree. Jakubdrastich2 (talk) 09:30, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

om
@ 113.175.14.46 (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2024 (UTC)