User talk:Kworbi

October 24
On the Evan Peters page, it's locked (or just not working for me) but the part with his relationship with Emma Roberts needs updated because (unfortunately) they got back together a few months later (Aug I think, but you can find articles) where they're "taking things slow". They also got engaged originally Christmas 2013, not included. You were the last to edit & since I've never done it & not working, it's why I'm sending it to you. Thanks!

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:44, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Conforming to sources
Hello. Your change to List of best-selling music artists in the United States has been reverted as it seems to have introduced multiple contradictions to the source. The first line of the article read both before and after your edits: "This is the list of the top 100 best-selling music artists in the United States only based on certifications of albums by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA)." This is very specific.

Wikipedia relies on reliable sources; we cannot change information in articles in such a way that it contradicts sources. Artists like Taylor Swift, Katy Perry and Rihanna are not on the list.

Please do not introduce information to the article that does not conform to the source. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * (Actually, Taylor is on there - she has 24.5 certified units by the RIAA. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:03, 9 June 2015 (UTC))

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Neon Nature Tour has been accepted
 The Neon Nature Tour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Kworbi (talk) 03:40, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Kworbi help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Speedy deletion nomination of The Neon Nature Tour


A tag has been placed on The Neon Nature Tour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Karst (talk) 06:46, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

First, sorry for my english because i'm french ! So, even if i don't post the references, I promise what i say about The Pinkprint Tour in Nîmes is true ! It's just France News doesn't talk about that, but you can see some messages on music website that talk about the medley : http://www.chartsinfrance.net/communaute/index.php?/topic/54120-nicki-minaj-the-pink-print-tour/page-19#entry3685569 You can also found videos that show the medley on Youtube or Energy Of Music VK I don't to be consider as a liar ^_^ Thank you !!! :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Super.Chopper-Man (talk • contribs) 18:50, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen of the Clouds Tour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Swedish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at American Horror Story: Hotel. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. ''You are neither new in Wikipedia, nor a good faith user, the long list of warnings in your talk page is proof enough. Just stop editing here altogether and learn policies first.'' — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat ] 04:20, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

List of American Horror Story characters - John Cromwell
Hi. Since you've started an edit war in the List of American Horror Story characters page, I've come here to clear things. The "Recurring" section is for actors that appeared in multiple seasons, which he did. He was credited as a younger Arden/Hans Grüper in both seasons, just like actress Alexandra Breckenridge was as Moira in Murder House. He was credited as such, and even if he wasn't, we can include him as an uncredited appearance. If we don't include him, the AHS pages will be inconsistent, since he's being mentioned in this page and in the Freak Show page. This is no "providing false info". So once again, stop this disruptive editing. If you're so bothered about it (and, apparently, you are the only one), you can discuss this in the talk page. Otherwise, leave it the way it is. Thank you. Israeldmo (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

The Pinkprint Tour
The European boxscores I edit in The Pinkprint Tour page, have been reported by Pollstar. Here is a link to a website that confirms that the attendances and revenue are true JonathanMinaj2 (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 8 October
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
 * On the American Horror Story: Hotel page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=684813648 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F684813648%7CAmerican Horror Story: Hotel%5D%5D Ask for help])

American Horror Story: Hotel
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Cebr1979 (talk) 04:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Hello, I'm Cornerstonepicker. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Pinkprint Tour because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Off-topic, not related to the tour at all. It's unnecessary add content like that, looks like a fan-written chapter. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 06:16, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat ] 18:42, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at American Horror Story: Hotel. — Indian: BIO  [ ChitChat ] 15:31, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

A Case of Idiocy
You have been warned a billion times your edits are erroneous, yet you continue to blatantly revert. I will be reporting you to the board and we'll finally be rid of this lunacy. LLArrow (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * @User:LLArrow Okay, and when you do, I'll be sure to mention how you revert all of my edits without a reason, while I support my edits with multiple reason why I made the change. I don't understand why you think reverting my edits without a reason is an offense on my part, but I think they will see otherwise. -- Kworbi


 * You have no place on Wikipedia. You refuse to learn how to use it properly and force your opinion on to every article you edit. I have given you multiple explanations of why your edits at AHS: Hotel have been reverted, yet you still claim ignorance and accuse others. I'm done with you. LLArrow (talk) 16:57, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * That is not true whatsoever. I provide proof to all of my edits, and you know that. Also, you haven't given any reasons why you reverted my edits. All you do is insult me, so don't say you give valid reasons. --- User:Kworbi


 * If you think any of what I have said to you is insulting, you must be new here. Learn how to sign your freaking comments already! With four tildes, it's so simple. LLArrow (talk) 21:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. LLArrow (talk) 18:51, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep it up
Keep up your disruptive editing and I'm reporting you, again, to the admins. Learn how to use Wikipedia already, and stop enforcing your opinion. LLArrow (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep up what? My last edit was removing episode numbers from the character section. That is what you wanted, so I'm helping enforce it. You're making absolutely no sense. If you'd like to explain what you're ranting about, I'd be glad to listen. Thanks! :) User:Kworbi


 * Oh cut the crap, you know exactly what I'm referring to. You obviously have ZERO knowledge of how actors are credited in television series, because if you did you would know the reason why the category of Guest stars and Recurring are two completely desperate things that have nothing to do with each other. Stop transcluding them into one big category like an idiot. Only edit when you know what you're doing please. Obviously that's never since you still haven't learned to sign your damn comments. LLArrow (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Do you watch the episodes closely or not? It clearly states at the beginning of each episode "Special Guest Stars" followed by "Guest Stars". Even if they do occur in more than one episode, they're stil guest starring. I clearly know what I'm doing since multiple other members agree with me on this situation, but nice try. I suggest taking a chill pill as well because you don't need to get all nasty when, might I add barely, explaining something. User:Kworbi

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Queen of the Clouds Tour for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen of the Clouds Tour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Queen of the Clouds Tour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Queen of the Clouds Tour.png
Thank you for uploading File:Queen of the Clouds Tour.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)