User talk:Kylesenior

I guess my talk page is very clean at the moment, huh?

OTR-21 Tochka
I invite you to discuss the reasoning behind your reverts to my edits on the talk page of the article. Danvolodar2 (talk) 17:24, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nomination period closing soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are still open, but not for long. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! No further nominations will be accepted after that time. Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election voting has commenced
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Appropriate questions for the candidates can also be asked. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

What are your questions?
HowardMorland (talk) 02:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for getting back to me.

In your article you wrote on the FAS website (https://sgp.fas.org/eprint/cardozo.html), you include a copy of the "Greenpeace Diagrams", allegedly showing the internals a W80 nuclear warhead.

I've been trying to track down the origin of this image. I've spoken to several knowledgeable people including Alex Wellerstein and generally people seem to be of the opinion that the images are fake. Commonly cited issues are the location of the neutrons guns, some other strange terminology used and the fact the design does not use an air lens implosion system.

However, in my research into a British developed concept codenamed Super Octopus, I've found evidence that Super Octopus (called a multi-point initiation system in the US) was adapted by the US in the 1960s and may be the modern basis for US and British primary stages, which the diagram appears to depict if the labels are ignored. Further, I have examined the diagram and the other diagrams in the set and based on the font used and the style of arrows used, I believe that the labels are later additions (see here https://imgur.com/a/Sd9IpzC).

Alex pointed me towards the original Greenpeace report which was produced by Large and Associates. I attempted to contact Large and Associates, but Mr Large died in 2018 and his widow informed me that after his death his collection of documents were professionally destroyed. This is where I am stuck trying to trace the images' origins. I did attempt to email Greenpeace UK through their public facing email, but they never got back to me.

I was hoping you might have another lead or know the actual origin of these images. Thanks. Kylesenior (talk) 06:09, 1 October 2021 (UTC)


 * "Professionally destroyed" sounds pretty serious. I'm afraid you know a lot more about this than I do.  At this point I don't even remember where I first saw the diagram.  Let me know if you learn anything more. HowardMorland (talk) 13:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Cheers. Don't worry about rushing or going out of your way for it; I have a long wait to go for my various FOIAs related to the topic. Kylesenior (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I'll get back to you next week on the Holocaust Bomb article. HowardMorland (talk) 03:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I just re-read your question, and I realize that I don't have anything that you don't already have. HowardMorland (talk) 19:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)


 * You can click the link in the FAS article and see what I saw of it. I assume it is mostly classified. HowardMorland (talk) 01:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)


 * So that's the full document there? I was hoping yo get a hold of scans as the transcript does not let me get a feel for how much was removed.Kylesenior (talk) 04:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting period closing soon
Hey y'all, voting for the 2021 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche will be closing soon. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2021. Voting will be conducted at the 2021 tranche page itself. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations opening soon
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election are opening in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 1 September). A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting doesn't commence until 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting opening soon!
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election opens in a few hours (00:01 UTC on 15 September) and will last through 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Correction to previous election announcement
Just a quick correction to the prior message about the 2022 MILHIST coordinator election! I didn't proofread the message well enough and left out a link to the election page itself in this message. The voting will occur here; sorry about the need for a second message and the inadvertent omission from the prior one. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election voting closing soon
Voting for the upcoming project coordinator election closes soon, at 23:59 on 28 September. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. Voting is conducted using simple approval voting and questions for the candidates are welcome. The voting itself is occurring here If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for un-"fixing" that
I must've hit the "save" button instead of "skip". Thanks. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 14:21, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Neutron bomb
Hey! Regarding the neutron bomb, I can understand reverting the typographic changes of US, but why would that involve removing missing commas and hyphens that were grammatically correct to insert? I am a professional proofreader by trade. Thanks for any clarity! Woolfy123 (talk) 12:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Cite for Special Atomic Demolition Munition pic?
Hi, Kylesenior. In reverting my edit, you commented (about a picture caption on Special Atomic Demolition Munition) that "The statement is sourced from the NWA, which sourced that statement from Hansen's Swords of Armageddon, which states that Socorro was probably a test of Gnat, which became the XW54." I'm not sure what the "NWA" is, and you seem to be an expert on this image caption's origins. Do you mind summarizing that knowledge inside some  tags? Thanks, Bernanke&#39;s Crossbow (talk) 03:59, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't need to, because it's already cited. I suggest you click on the picture, read the caption, and click on the associated link that reads very clearly "Source". The statement is not by Los Alamos. Kylesenior (talk) 07:17, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election nominations open
Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Human Interference Task Force deletion
Hi Kylesenior! I was doing research on nuclear waste storage and I noticed you deleted the following section from the end of the only paragraph on this page: Specifically, the task force was to research the use of long-time warning messages to prevent future access to the planned, but stalled, deep geological nuclear repository project of Yucca Mountain.

I'm curious why- it's a useful piece of information, and the edit summary didn't shine any light on it. Was it incorrect?

Thanks! 130.195.253.22 (talk) 04:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)


 * I am unsure how my edit summary of "Uncited 6 months to 5 years" is unclear. It was uncited information and little better than hearsay.Kylesenior (talk) 08:16, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks Kyle, I suppose I was just unfamiliar with the terminology. 130.195.253.7 (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I apologise for being so harsh in my response. Kylesenior (talk) 08:48, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:56, 22 December 2023 (UTC)