User talk:L-Zwei

IP address 203.146.247.71 has been blocked. However, my ISP just use this and now I can't edit. If unblock this IP address is so risky, please give me some advice that not involve change the ISP (it's only one that provide acceptable surfing speed here)L-Zwei 11:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've unblocked, it looks like it might be a compromised computer somewhere in your ISP's network, don't be alarmed if it gets blocked again :| -- Tawker 14:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. L-Zwei 16:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hi L-Zwei, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

""

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

""

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

Images
Concerning your latest image uploads that have overwrited mine and Tenshouzans, may I ask why you uploaded over the LLN series images...? They were fine they way they were, and your promotional art lacks their weaponry. Although I can see why you replaced the Raiden series image - as the image didn't depict its right arm, replacing the others was somewhat needless. I'm not mad or anything mind you, just confused. Could you explain your reasoning..? Thanks, and welcome to wikipedia by the way. Please respond on my talk page. -MegamanZero|Talk 17:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh! The license, eh..? Just change it to in the space where it has licensing. No need to change out the picture! :) I like the concept art too, but it strips away their weaponry, and I really would like the pictures to include that. In the future, could you find art that includes the weaponry..? Thanks, and I'm glad you're working on the Virtual On articles with me and Tenshozohan, we really need the help. :) Nice to meet you by the way.-MegamanZero|Talk 17:48, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * No problem, that sounds fine. BTW, which VR(s) do you prefer to play as..? And what's your favorite Virtual On game..? -MegamanZero|Talk 12:17, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, don't worry about it. I suck too. :) I gave up unlocking all the virtuaoids on Virtual On Marz and just traded in the damn thing. It was so fustrating and meaningless. Don't purchase it, if possible. Your nerves will thank you. My specialty includes fighting games and some racing games. Dead or Alive is my most skilled game by far- Online, I am ranked 5th in the entire world. -MegamanZero|Talk 14:00, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Searching
I did a search for "Teil's Impluse" and "Gundam Sidestory" on several web browsers. I got nothing that would suggest it even existed, except for various copies on other on-line encyclopedias of Wikipedia Articles that mentioned Tiel's Impluse and the Gundam Sidestory. Both names and titles sounded like Fanfiction, and there was nothing I could find online that suggested that either existed other than on-line encyclopedias. There are plenty of instances in which I found Fanfiction inside wikipedia, and by first search seemed to have confirmed this suspecion. Only until you changed the article did I decided to email some of my friends who were into Gundam. Most never heard of Teil's Impluse or the Sidestory. However, I did find one friend who, long ago, did read Teil's Impluse and and the Sidestory. The research wasn't the probelm. The problem was that there was little information to begin with. --Eldarone 17:29, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I should also note the burden of proof is not on me. See Wikipedia's article on verfiability.  --Eldarone 01:25, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Sorry for using your talk page but I think that I must reply your message and I think that you wont go to my talk page again so I used yours to reply.

Thanks (L-Zwei) I didn't thought that Notepad is doing this and sure I'll try to use Wordpad next time.

I know that noone will trust me easily it need a lot of time and I must wrok well to be known be a lot of members, And really I'm sorry I think that it's my mistake to let my friend use this account to vandalize articles or to use my computer from the start, I'm trying now to make a good edits and hopefuly that it will be nice and you will agree with it but if there are no reason to miss with me I hope that you will discuss about what I want to edit since (Draconins) said that I must discuss before editing randomly, And don't care about what type of this message is since it's about knowledge, Also there is nothing personal against you too, I hope that next message will be about the works.(I think that you can delete this message after you read it). And sorry again.Astrys 01:00, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Question?
Just I want to know this not to write it. Please please please tell me if you know or ask anyone, Which long range beam cannon is more stronger and why? Destiny Gundam's cannon or the Gunner Zaku's cannon or Blast Impulse's cannon pease help me if you know or tell anyone to answer it please please please, And I'm very sorry.Astrys 14:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for replying, I know that the question isn't so clear because there aren't any special thing to compare between the cannons, But I wanted to ask this question because I'm interest in Video Games so I watched some videos for GSD Union vs ZAFT II and I saw a strange thing that Gunner Zaku and Blast Impulse cannon are shooting a big long continuous laser(that's it still for 5-7sec like Destiny's and SF cannon's when cancelling each other) while Destiny cannon shot just a small normal shot after charging (It seems like the beam rifle green Shot but more bigger) So I can't beleive that the designers made Destiny's cannon weaker than Blast and Gunner cannon and when I post that in www.Gamefaqs.com to discuss about it(Because in gamefaqs any person who wanted a question can discuss it in the web) a person said that Blast>Gunner>Destiny, So I wanted to ask you then if this is your opinions I respect it and I can trust you but please if you know other people who are interest in GSD could you sak them, And about the source I checked MS GSD Generation of C.E. and I saw that one shot from Destiny cannon is stronger than two shots from Blast and Gunner cannon so could that help if not could you help.Astrys 17:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry but I want to know if that's true or what, The guy who said that Destiny's cannon is weaker than Gunner's and Blast proved that by saying :

simply because Destiny's beam cannon's blast radias is MUCH smaller per beamAstrys 13:28, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok! Then I don't think that Destiny cannon blast radias is much smaller than Gunner Zaku's and Blast impulse radias I saw some clips in the series and it's not sure that Destiny cannon radias is smaller and weaker and there I saw episode32 When stellar was piloting Destroy in Berlin the cannon's blast from the chest were very huge but when Sting in ep38 fires the chest cannons at Destiny they were small and in ep38 Sting fires the big cannon(while in the transform mode before being a MS) and the blast radiases were very big at the see(bigger than Minerva) and in in ep45 the radiases of the same cannons were smaller than Destiny gundam so that's true we can't trust SEED animators they are lazy(no new scens).


 * I want to ask did MS Gundam Generatin of C.E prove anything since Destiny's cannon is stronger.


 * Or did Junius Treaty help since they can't Build any strong MS (Impulse and Zaku were build under it's rules) while Destiny Gundam violates it's rules.


 * And what abut the powerpland is it helps in anything.Astrys 21:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Randall Brackett/Test
I've made a slight redesign on the uniform Template:General CVG character. I've stated reasoning on the WP:CVG talkpage. Any comments on the new design would be appreciated. -Randall Brackett 07:54, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

PS Armour!
Hello again, Well While rewatching some episodes of Seed I rewatched the episode when Waltfeld said that Strike's PS is able to take 76 hits from BuCUE's missiles so I want to ask about if it's the same issue about Freedom's PS, Also wing zero custom was shot down by the serpent M-guns(bullets) so if those things hits Freedom or any other MS that is protected by PS and powered by a Nuclear reactor would it be shot down too or not.Astrys 01:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Kira Yamato!
Well, I don't know why but As I know Kira is considered by some fans that he is a (Fictional messiah) but is he also considered as a(Fictional God) I don't think that but is that true because I saw that in his (categoris) I just want to ask, And sorry for asking you every time. Astrys 02:31, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

And I was discussing with some guys about Destiny I said to them that it has unlimited potential and I proved that by posting a link to Destiny's page from Wikipedia but they said that wikipedia isn't an official site, What I can say to them about that. again I'm very sorry. Astrys 02:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Simply true Destiny has some flaws in it's Design but it's still early to say that it's design is bad comparing to other protagonist MSes because I hope that there will be a second class for Destiny, About Unlimited Potential the guys forgot it but I still remember that I saw the Unlimited Potential line in one of Destiny's model kit instructions I'm not sure about it I'll try to search but maybe it will be very hard since I don't know any model kit sooooo I'll forget about this thing.

OH... Ya I want to add for mecha's with true unlimited potential SRX (the both) and Genesic Gaogaigar + what you mentined, Really those kind of mses would burn all Gundams.

And about Kira I really saw that thing about Fictional god two times: first in trivia and the second in categoris but it was deleted because it's surely a fake also about fictional Messiah I think that it's and overstatement to be said I don't consider him to be like that he is really as good as Shinn and Athrun if not that they are better, That thing wasn'y saod for Amuro,Char or even Domon but maybe it can be called for pilots from C.E... Hmmmmm I don't know maybe you know more and more than me, However Thanks.Astrys 02:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

...
ok im still new to A LOT of aspects of wikipedia... mind if i get some help ^_^'--Spartan117009 05:55, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Zeta Gundam

 * It is on my list of articles needing to be improved. I will be doing it tomorrow. (2:00 a.m. here Orz)  I am still fighting against myself in merging Z Plus to it.  However, Z Plus seems to have pretty much even more notability on Zeta. (Okay, they have both impacted each other on various redesigns).  Also, I have not watched the Evolve for Zeta yet, that will need more time. MythSearchertalk 18:00, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Mak-005s.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Mak-005s.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:11, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Gundam Mk. II
I've put up an editprotected template on the Gundam Mk. II to try and get it restored to the previous version as accepted by the current consensus. Am I correct in assuming you prefer the version that you, Jtrainor, Mythsearcher and I have been editing? I don't want to misrepresent your intentions in making such requests, so please clarify if that is not correct.

That said, I imagine A Man In Black will attempt to claim that I'm the only "consensus" in this (or any of the relevant) article(s), so if my assumptions are correct, stating the facts would be appreciated. Thanks. MalikCarr (talk) 04:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, good, I haven't been putting words in your mouth, then. At any rate, would you then support a revert as I have proposed in the editprotected template? MalikCarr (talk) 04:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Moonlight butterfly
It is in the mook of Turn A Gundam, Turn X cannot use moonlight butterfly at all until it copied the nano-machines from Turn A. And Turn A only have enough power for short term usage by itself. Can you list the episodes that Turn X and Turn A uses moonlight butterfly by themselves? MythSearchertalk 17:20, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:XXXG-00W0K.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:XXXG-00W0K.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Valkyrie (Super Robot Wars)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Valkyrie (Super Robot Wars), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * This element of the Super Robot Wars series do not establish independent notability. Without coverage in reliable third party sources, these are just made up of unnecessary plot summary, game guide material, and original research. Relevant AfDs include Articles for deletion/Database (Super Robot Wars), Articles for deletion/Arado Balanga, Articles for deletion/AS Soleares/AS Alegrías, and Articles for deletion/Ruach Ganeden and more. All discussions resulted to deletion of the nominated articles.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Magioladitis (talk) 08:14, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Pepsi > Coca-Cola
Dude, Pepsi is way better than Coke. I dare you to take the Pepsi Challenge, and still say that Coke is better.

Seriously, just give it a chance! You'll like it...

P.S. Full Metal Panic! is way better than Gundam, but I respect your opinion. 72.76.28.224 (talk) 04:11, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GT-9600.gif
A tag has been placed on File:GT-9600.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Farix (Talk) 02:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GX-9900.gif
A tag has been placed on File:GX-9900.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Farix (Talk) 02:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:GW-9800.gif
A tag has been placed on File:GW-9800.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Farix (Talk) 02:09, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mak-005s.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Mak-005s.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.  Zoo Fari  01:58, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Ma-09.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Ma-09.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Farix (t &#124; c) 18:35, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Sonic 2006
I still don't see why not having less than 40% on GR makes it not an example of a video game notable for negative reception. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:38, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Since when does GR define what is notable for negative reception? The inclusion of GR as an important criteria for what's included only makes the list bigger and unwieldy. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 18:36, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of RGM-89 Jegan and others
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are RGM-89 Jegan, MS-09 Dom, Nu Gundam. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Articles for deletion/RGM-89 Jegan (2nd nomination) for RGM-89 Jegan, Articles for deletion/MS-09 Dom for MS-09 Dom, Articles for deletion/Nu Gundam for Nu Gundam. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Cthulhu
Also, just so you know.... http://castlevania.wikia.com/wiki/Malachi Gpia7r (talk) 15:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Notification
Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents IvoryMeerkat (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing of ASD - Tower Defense entry from "List of open-source video games"
Hi,

I wonder why do you have removed the entry of "ASD - Tower Defense" in this page : List of open-source video games.

I have unfortunately not yet had time to create a wiki page of the game...

Here are more information about the game : ASD - TD on Google Code

Thank you in advance for your answer.

daarkon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daarkron (talk • contribs) 12:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Elder sign
Is there a particular reason you removed a citation from an article tagged as needing citations without any comment? Darker Dreams (talk) 14:09, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
 * A link or directions to an outside source which directly supports the statement it is placed adjacent to is the definition of a citation... so, yes, it's an outside link. What's your point? It leads to a specific entry in an independent catalogue of related matter. IE a source or citation. I ask again; why did you remove a citation from an article tagged as needing citation without comment? If there’s an issue with that website as a source please elaborate. Darker Dreams (talk) 08:06, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if you're trying to be offensively condescending, but that's how you're sounding. Yes, I saw the "Notes" and "References" section. Did you see the header block that says add inline references? Or, perhaps, you were just being lazy and reverting rather than making a proper citation from the link. Darker Dreams (talk) 05:02, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Eye of Cthulhu
Why did you remove the reference to the game Terraria in cthulhu Games section ? if the cite was bad then it can be changed. as you can see in the Wikipedia page of terraria one of the main bosses there is the "eye of Cthulhu" (refrencing Cthulhu wiki page) this does not mean that Cthulhu is an eyeball - it is a comedic take of cthulhu. Same as "Munchkin Cthulhu" written in the cthulhu page under games paragraph - does not mean that Cthulhu is a Munchkin. Mike2learn (talk) 17:53, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-Free rationale for File:JBtech.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JBtech.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under Non-Free content criteria but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a Non-Free rationale.

If you have uploaded other Non-Free media, consider checking that you have specified the Non-Free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:03, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Editing another user's user page
Please do not make an edit like this to another user's userpage. User pages states that "it is usual to avoid substantially editing another's user and user talk pages other than where it is likely edits are expected and/or will be helpful." An edit like that cannot be helpful. Ryan Vesey Review me!  04:03, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nrx-044tr3.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nrx-044tr3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 11:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of video games notable for negative reception. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SudoGhost 04:34, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Why did you revert my edit?
Hi L-Zwei, can you please explain your revert. Your comment there says "the link isn't about browser game". I am not sure which link you are talking about. As this game is a spin-off/remake of the original Mad TV video game, the linked wikipedia page as well talks about the video game first, browser game as a foot note. How can we add this game to the List_of_multiplayer_browser_games now? Thanks. --Kebap (talk) 13:34, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Msz-008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Msz-008.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)