User talk:L-native

November 2018
Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I noticed that in this edit to Jacobs University Bremen, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:26, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * How long will be a reason I need to provide? It seems you have undo all changes I have made gradually, probably without read the page itself? Mr. L  (Talk / Contrib) 18:29, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi L-native, Good day. You could just provide as short brief info on the summary edit. If you removed a sourced content and will rewrite the content (make sure with inline citation), then just put, remove content and will rewrite with source on next edit - so we could check on your next edit you have done so. You can re-paste your edits my edit and stated the conversation we have here and do remember to leave edit summary next time. Thank you.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 18:47, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually the change you mentioned was an reorganization, not a removal. I thought it's tiny, so I didn't write anything to describe. I was going to put it in another section. I am not sure how to re-do the changes and write a summary now. It was many works. Do you mean I should write something in Edit summary, even after editing this conversation? Mr. L  (Talk / Contrib) 00:00, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jacobs University Bremen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graduate ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Jacobs_University_Bremen check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Jacobs_University_Bremen?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi Thank you for your reminder. I have fixed the links.  Mr. L(talk/contribs) 15:50, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Schaft
There is no need to have a disambiguation hatnote that links to a red article because it leads the reader nowhere. Other editors will remove it because they assume the article has been deleted. Write it first, and then you can link to it. ... disco spinster   talk  14:39, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, I understand your point. However, I was not able to find a way to create new page without a red article link. This is the cause. Thank you for your reminder. Mr. L(talk/contribs) 15:09, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * At WP:Your first article is a method you can use to create a new article from scratch. You can also search for the title, and if it's not found there will be a note at the top saying You may create the page "[John Q. Redlink]". ...  disco spinster   talk  15:38, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * . The situation is I have searched and there is no creating the page function any more. Yes, I found them in the past. And the pages are deleted by wikipedia now. Mr. L(talk/contribs) 22:11, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SCHAFT (company)


A tag has been placed on SCHAFT (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Cabayi (talk) 15:47, 15 November 2018 (UTC)


 * , Hi. You are very efficient by deleting. I don't even understand why it is not notable enough. Mr. L(talk/contribs) 22:14, 15 November 2018 (UTC)