User talk:L e cox

A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, L e cox. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on, consult Questions, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! meco (talk) 00:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Talk page messages
 Note: Always remember to substitute user warning templates. For help on user warnings, see the WikiProject on User Warnings. Older warnings may have been removed, but are still visible in the [ page history]. [Admin: block | [ unblock] / Info: contribs | [ page moves] | [ block log] | [ block list]] Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:2012 Aurora shooting are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. JoeSperrazza (talk) 13:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Aurora shooting
Heh. I don't entirely agree with the manner in which your comments about "intelligence community involvement" were removed from Aurora shooting talk, but those who objected have a point regarding how WP ought to be used (e.g., not a soapbox). This does not mean that all relevant, reliably sourced information should not be included in the article: if there is intelligence community involvement these details will surface and can be added to the article. Look, for example, at the Waco siege article, which has been edited over the course of years. Btw you are probably right about wider involvement - the "lone gunman" theory is clearly BS to anyone who has followed the story. Mfhiller (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2012 (UTC)