User talk:Lacunae

Response coming soon regarding reversion in Great Storm of 1987
Greetings Pools. I am ChrisJBenson (talk). You reverted my recent edit to the article about the Great Storm of 1987, and made several very helpful and appreciated comments along the way. But a response from me is brewing on the horizon. I lost my home computer (inaccessible hard disk) during creation of a carefully crafted and researched series of responses to your series of points. This served as a temporary respite for me as well as you (my own health isn't much better than my computer's), but over this weekend (a three day weekend in my transplanted home in the States), I will try to rebuild and complete that response and convey it to you on a borrowed laptop.

Of course I have been wrong, and it has happened before in Mathematics seemingly more after three degrees in it from Manchester. If aspects of my carefully worded edit are still wrong after I submit specific supporting mathematical, climatological, and mass media evidence, I will be happy upon learning why. I had an irrefutably sound basis for entering into an immediate "edit without discussion" in the first place though, as the first sentence of the section currently violates two Wikipedia policies. The response will be rather lengthier than this, so I am not sure if I should clutter up your page here with it, place it on my talk page, or the article's talk page. Some of it is certainly suited to being kept on the article's talk page. I wanted not to warn you, but to ask you "to hold those thoughts" on your reversion for a few days, but not dismiss them entirely.

I almost prefer to be wrong and learn why. Almost. With many thanks for Wikipedia's most thoughtfully documented edit reversion, from the revertee ChrisJBenson (talk) 21:59, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Cyclone Anna
Perhaps helpful:
 * The €300m cost of Superstorm Christine
 * Government Group To Discuss Clare Flood Damage
 * Government 'To Fast-Track' Flood Repair Funds
 * Loop Head Hit By Flooding In Latest Storm
 * Clare Flooding Damage To Exceed One Million Euro

It is sad that my camera is out of action now so I will be unable to provide pictures of Quilty, Spanish Point, Lahinch, Liscannor or Doolin. Some sights were frightening! The Banner talk 19:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

And again: I hope you can use this! The Banner talk 21:07, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Clontarf flood wall is back on agenda after €57m storm
 * State handed €24m flood repair bill from one council alone

Thanks for your efforts on this article, I really appreciate this. I don't regard it a secret that I live in Milltown Malbay, close to the badly hit Lahinch en Quilty. By the way: who were those two American edit warriors? The Banner talk 17:16, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

File:AntjeBarbara.png
I noticed you removed this image and marked it for speedy deletion, so... One of the pages linked there,, says at the top, "Aktualni data z polarnich druzic NOAA" which seems to translate to "Actual data from NOAA polar satellites", in which case the file would be in the public domain as a work of the federal government of the United States. Dustin ( talk ) 19:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

My reading of it was that the data is from NOAA, however the processing of the free data into imagery by the Czech meteorological organisation gives them the ownership of copyright, such as applied at other sites e.g. http://www.woksat.info/wwp.html. I want to try and use the images from EUMetView, but I'm working out how their data reuse policy relates to wikipedia non-free/commons policy, as I see their imagery is used elsewhere for example .Lacunae (talk) 21:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
 * That's a shame. I'd have hoped that since NOAA released it for free, derivatives would also remain free / non-copyrighted. Anyway, on the image you just linked, it seems that such images should be available per this link: "EUMETSAT grants all users the right to use, download and copy information, images, documents and materials from the website on the condition that each information, image, document and material taken from the website carries the EUMETSAT copyright credit "copyright {year} EUMETSAT" (where {year} is the current year)." Dustin  ( talk ) 21:28, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

1973 storm
If you were Dutch you would know. My sources are in Dutch, including a TV news item. Read Radio Veronica and read about the storm. The 1972 one and the 1973 one did really cause widespread damages. On both occasions it was like a rooftile storm. ~ But why not asking me instead of just reverting? There is a real existing person behind this IP number ... 83.85.143.141 (talk) 17:09, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

1. I reverted an edit you made to a listing of a storm in October 1986 2. wikipedia policy is that non-sourced material can be removed 3. The value is more extreme (928 mb) than even the national Dutch record and so is incorrect (954 hPa see List of atmospheric pressure records in Europe) 4. If you wish greater acknowledgement of the person behind your IP, I suggest you get a username. 5. Dutch sources are perfectly acceptable.Lacunae (talk) 17:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for letting me know which source you want. We Dutch mostly went through the eye of the storm which affected conditions from the Portuguese coast to the North Cape. Meteorological charts and maps then were very impressive. Never did I see such a vast depression. But the wind scale effort disappointed. Being a coastal child I expected more. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 21:37, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Creating an identity is creating an imaginery, a false claim of the truth. Autobiografic stuff isn't trustworthy. And like an IP address it can be run by multiple persons. 83.85.143.141 (talk) 21:42, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Chew Stoke flood of 1968
I noticed the article Chew Stoke flood of 1968 when you added some links, however the flooded affected more than one village and most of the Chew Valley so how about Chew Valley flood of 1968 as a title?&mdash; Rod talk 20:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * It also includes the Pforzheim Tornado, Germany which is miles away and shouldn't be included.&mdash; Rod talk 20:09, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

I don't mind widening out the article title to Chew Valley flood of 1968 or something inclusive of the rain in the wider area and flooding in Bristol. I was mostly aiming to disentangle the article Great Flood of 1968 which had this flood in July and another in the Southeast UK in September mixed in. The Pforzheim tornado is meteorologically related, and I'd prefer to keep this in as otherwise it doesn't really have a home on the English Wikipedia, and is notable, and possibly can in future be worked on further into its own article.Lacunae (talk) 20:20, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Greece + Numa
I was asked last night about Greece naming Numa and I wondered what you knew about it and does it mean that Greece thinks Numa was a Tropical Storm? Jason Rees (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

I think this article says the National Observatory of Athens don't consider Numa to be Tropical.http://greece.greekreporter.com/2017/11/22/no-link-between-hurricane-numa-and-deadly-floods-in-greece-say-meteorologists/

Orphaned non-free image File:Flood Re logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Flood Re logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Masum Reza 📞 06:30, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Muckle Spate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Strathspey ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Muckle_Spate check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Muckle_Spate?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Invite!
Hi! If you are still here, you may want to join us! Please note that your WikiProject idea will be our responsibility.  Mario Jump  83!  00:40, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Category:Breitbart London has been nominated for merging
Category:Breitbart London has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-05/bureau-of-meterology-air-pressure-miscalculation/104063982 Lacunae (talk) 08:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)