User talk:Lapabc

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --Arcadian (talk) 00:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Latest in CSPI Criticism
Hey Lapabc,

I saw that you had once made a stab at finding a "fair-and-balanced" (to steal a phrase from Fox News) way of documenting some of the controversy surrounding the Center for Science in the Public Interest. I recently made a venture into same (with much trepidition after having seen what happened to all the previous attempts), but we've seemingly started to get a section that has some consensus support behind it, and I would love to know what you think. There's an active discussion on the talk page, so you can weigh in with any thoughts there.

Thanks, Rnickel (talk) 19:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Neuroleadership
Hi -- you need to complete the process of nominating the article for deletion, as explained in the template that now appears at the top of the article. I basically agree with you that the article should be deleted, but there is no way for me to say so until you create the deletion debate, Articles for deletion/Neuroleadership. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:56, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi back -- I was diverted but eventually completed the deletion debate setup. I've never gone through this deletion business before and I'm concerned about something I noticed so I'm curious what you might say.  First, this "NeuroLeadership" is pure 21st century hucksterism in which an individual, David Rock, is trying to use Wikipedia to legitimize and promote his executive coaching business but is not a legitimate new area of scholarly study as claimed by Rock and his associates in the "NeuroLeadership Institute" that he founded... I say this as someone with a background in neuroscience (PhD, 1999) and in management (MBA, 2013)... and you're apparently a neuroscientist so you know that people try to slap the label "neuro" onto lots of nonsense to make it seem more scientific.  Anyway, Wikipedia policy on neologisms is that they are commonly deleted since articles are often created in an attempt to use Wikipedia to increase usage of the term and it's reasonably clear that's what's going on here. But my concern is that this page is being protected.  From the history, I can see two attempts to delete it.  One was cleared by a user (not administrator) Northamerica1000 who seems gets involved in lots and lots of deletion nominations but user page shows that he ended them by "Non-administrator closure" and all of them were keeps, none were deleted.  So anyone can close a delete request? Not just an administrator?... and by the way, why didn't you nominate it for deletion? Lapabc (talk) 06:47, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Quite honestly, Wikipedia is full of low quality articles, and if I declared war on them, I would spend all my time being angry and never accomplish anything positive -- so when I run into resistance trying to get rid of one, unless it is really terrible I usually leave it alone. Regarding this specific issue, there are two ways of proposing an article for deletion.  The simplest is "proposed deletion" (see WP:PROD), but that can be removed by any editor for any reason.  The more complex is AfD, which you did here.  An AfD nomination can in principle be closed by non-admins, but in practice an editor who does it in the absence of a completely clear consensus is going to face a lot of kickback -- doing that more than a couple of times will result in the editor being banned from it. Looie496 (talk) 15:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)


 * Looie, I made a long reply to I,Jethrobot after he posted a reply to your vote to delete. I'm going to stop at this point, I've got bigger fish to fry as do you, but I thought I'd give you an FYI.  Lapabc (talk) 22:31, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:BPIFfamily-BPIF-A4P.png


A tag has been placed on File:BPIFfamily-BPIF-A4P.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 01:12, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)