User talk:Law Lord

Tarot
I genuinely do not see how those citations are supposed to support any of the claims the articles make. They don't even include them. All of this is just personal musings added by one user in 2006 without citation, and it needs to be yanked unless the precise claims can be supported. Herr Gruber (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * I agree that further sources would be beneficial, which is why finding such sources is high on my agenda. Your initial edit summary ("what is this stupid buggery bullshit") left me in doubt as to the thought and sincereness behind your edit. Some might interpret your reference to buggery as homophobic. If I am not able to find sources within 14 days, I agree with the removal of said section of the article. --Law Lord (talk) 20:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Well, that would imply only homosexuals have anal sex, that homosexuals only have anal sex (including the women), and that text is capable of having sex of any kind, so, um... :P But from what I can tell, it's just one person's essays, it's the same for all the major arcana cards that haven't had that section removed. And it looks to mostly be the Nostradamus-y "A shares at least one trait with B, therefore A means B" and silly numerology stuff like "if you add the digits together you get another card with two people on it." Herr Gruber (talk) 20:18, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)