User talk:Lccasey67
You just mada a report at the edit warring noticeboard, but you didn't mention what article you suspect of violating copyright. I'm guessing it is the Wiborada article. 'Just saying that this article is a complete plagiarism of http://www.catholic.org/saints/saint.php?saint_id=2102 see for yourself. At first glance you might have a point, in that some of the material is word-for-word the same. However, in this case we need to rule out the occurrence of reverse copying, i.e. that the material at www.catholic.org might have been copied from Wikipedia. The Wikipedia article has had much the same material since 2007, and I can't determine the age of the corresponding entry at catholic.org. If you want editors to look into this more thoroughly, you could try following the advice at Wikipedia:Spotting possible copyright violations. That page suggests that you consider making a note at the article talk page, in this case, Talk:Wiborada. When you do so, you should include the URL mentioned above. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:25, 2 January 2017 (UTC)