User talk:Lee Vilenski/Archives/2018/September

WikiCup 2018 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2018 WikiCup has now come to an end. The eight users who made it to the final round had to score a minimum of 422 points to qualify, with the top score in the round being 4869 points. The leaders in round 4 were:


 * Courcelles scored a magnificent 4869 points, with 92 good articles on Olympics-related themes. Courcelles' bonus points alone exceeded the total score of any of the other contestants!
 * Kees08 was second with 1155 points, including a high-scoring featured article for Neil Armstrong, two good topics and some Olympics-related good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, with 1066 points, was in third place this round, with two featured articles and a good article, all on natural history topics.
 * Other contestants who qualified for the final round were 🇲🇭 Nova Crystallis, Iazyges,  SounderBruce,  🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Kosack and 🇺🇸 Ceranthor.

During round four, 6 featured articles and 164 good articles were promoted by WikiCup contestants, 13 articles were included in good topics and 143 good article reviews were performed. There were also 10 "in the news" contributions on the main page and 53 "did you knows". Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best editor win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:31, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lionel Messi
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lionel Messi. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Saudi Arabia. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 Paul Hunter Classic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamie Jones ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2018_Paul_Hunter_Classic check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2018_Paul_Hunter_Classic?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

We need your input! Request for Comment - Including China's stance on Hamas
Your name was found on Feedback request service Politics, government, and law. Please join the discussion here and give your needed opinion on whether to include China's position concerning Hamas. Thanks! Veritycheck✔️ (talk) 15:54, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Advice
Hello, I noticed you assessed Imaqtpie as Start class. It is one of my first articles I have created, so I was wondering if you would please give me some advice on how to improve it to C class or better? I have already taken a look at WikiProject_Video_games/Assessment but I am still confused. I do not disagree with your assessment, but I would appreciate some advice. Thank you. Derek M (talk) 01:34, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
 * - Of course, friend! Maybe I was a little harsh, and a potentially C grade, was warranted. However, the current talks regarding an esports MOS makes it more difficult to give a higher rating. However, here's the issues that cause me not to give a B, at least.


 * The lede - It's too short for one, and isn't written well. It also doesn't follow the WP:BLP Manual of Style, regarding how the subject's birth should be stated. For a decent article, we'd expect some information as to why the subject is notable in the lede. Other than saying he is a popular streamer, I'd expect some information regarding his career in the lede other than a team he was once in really.
 * Article status does have more to it than just what content is there, there seems to be very few line breaks in the article, which is a problem.
 * Career sections should really not have quotations. These are designed to be a summary of how the user's career manifests; changing teams, performance in tournaments, etc. Quotes are fine to make a specific point, but not anecdotately.
 * Inconsistency on the level heads for career. You start by simply labelling the years, and then that he transfers, and then just a name. You're better off putting dates in brackets to state what part of the subject's life you are referring to.
 * The quote you have could be considered overly big, and copyright infringment.
 * Directly below, you use the word "today", but this is present tense, and is likely to not be true at some point. Remove.
 * "In a Reddit AMA, Santana said the origin of his name came from his mom calling him "cute"." -This isn't personal life. Not sure why it's here.

There are a few more things, and I hope you don't think I'm too harsh, but I don't want you to suddenly submit this as a GA, as it isn't there yet.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 15:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Don't worry about this article suddenly being submitted as GA -- I agree with your Start assessment. Thanks a lot for your advice! You've given me a lot of ideas on how to improve the article. Derek M (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Not a problem! Happy to help. I'm no super duper layout editor, or anything, but I am one of a few that will rate new articles consistently. I'm probably a little harsher than most on what I would give a B or C grade. I'd simply be aware that outside of GA or FA (Or Featured List) status, the ratings are pretty much cosmetic; unless it's a stub.


 * Please let me know if you improve the article, and I'll check it again.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 07:45, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:32, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Notability
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Notability. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Poodle
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Poodle. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Szlachta
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Szlachta. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Shenphen Rinpoche
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Shenphen Rinpoche. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Jimmy White's 2: Cueball
Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Jimmy White's 2: Cueball has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the GAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:59, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * - Thank you for your time. Great work as always  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)


 * You're most welcome! Twofingered Typist (talk) 14:04, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ron Stallworth. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)