User talk:Leefeni de Karik

My archive: User talk:Leefeni de Karik/Archive

Rollback granted
Hi Leefeni de Karik. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3ALeefeni_de_Karik enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Karin Schubert
Next time please do WP:BEFORE.96.127.242.226 (talk) 16:53, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Grenadian Creole French) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Grenadian Creole French.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed,Rosguill talk 22:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you, but I've actually just split this text manually from now defunct Grenadian Creole. I'm too much in a hurry to review the history of this page, but you should check its history to see who actually copied the linked website if relevant. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 23:06, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Callichirus major
—valereee (talk) 00:01, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

Eastern Orthodox opinion on theologoumenons
I was not aware of the precise meaning of a theologoumenon in Eastern Orthodoxy which you mentioned in your edit semmary. Could you add those details, along with sources supporting them, at Theologoumenon, since they are not present there? Veverve (talk) 10:55, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, maybe later. A famous work by Zankow which is already referenced in Theologoumenon expresses the view (notoriously brought up in Vasily Bolotov's defense of the Filioque) that a theologoumenon must be professed by at least one Church Father. This lecture by Fr. John Romanides gives a hint that he disapproves the concept, and says it doesn't apply to the Filioque anyway. In his own book on the Filioque, Fr. Dumitru Staniloae prsents the concept of theologoumenon as shaky and leading to confusion between truth and error. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 16:53, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Leefeni de Karik/Userboxes/Dugin
User:Leefeni de Karik/Userboxes/Dugin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Leefeni de Karik/Userboxes/Dugin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Leefeni de Karik/Userboxes/Dugin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 04:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Union of Brest
Hi Leefeni,

Thanks for you contribution to Union of Brest! If you're familiar with the topic, I'd love if you'd assist me in further improving and adding further detail to it sometime. KaerbaqianRen 💬 21:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)


 * @KaerbaqianRen I would love to. Right now, I'm too busy to direct any effort, but hit me up anytime you need help. Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 17:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * No worries, Wikipedia isn't mandatory! I will reach out to you when I have more time myself to contribute to the article! Maybe eventually we will be able to flesh it out a bit more thoroughly... KaerbaqianRen 💬 17:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @KaerbaqianRen It would be delightful. Greetings! Leefeniaures audiendi audiat 00:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm ArdynOfTheAncients. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Girondins. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ArdynOfTheAncients (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Chinese spelling reform has been nominated for deletion
Category:Chinese spelling reform has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Remsense 聊  19:11, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)