User talk:Lemonreader

Let us settle this before edit war
Why is your picture of henry fonda better than the one that was in the article before? - AH (talk) 01:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Mister Roberts is a far more famous film and one that fonda is known for. It was also significantly more commercially successful, and represents fonda at a height of his career and in his prime. - AH (talk) 02:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Generally, a picture of an actor in person is preferred - not in a military uniform even if it's just for acting. Also, picture quality matters. That Warlock picture could look like just a regular picture anywhere. Look up in other stars' pictures. Most of them are depicted in everyday clothes at its time. Also, that Mister Roberts picture has a poor quality. Thus, a publicity picture who depicts Fonda in person - just like a regular picture - is preferred and a good quality picture is also preferred. Also, taking this into consideration, I think it is unnecessary to caption the photo with the name of film corresponding to the picture. A simple 'Fonda in a publicity still, 1959' would work. Lemonreader (talk) 06:45, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Adding to this, a picture of Fonda in Mister Roberts has been added to article, but not into the infobox, but rather in a section detailing his postwar career, as a compromise. That way, people would still look up and read the article and recognize him from a movie. Lemonreader (talk) 06:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henry Fonda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mister Roberts ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Henry_Fonda check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Henry_Fonda?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landmark (hotel and casino)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Landmark (hotel and casino) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 21:20, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Landmark (hotel and casino)
The article Landmark (hotel and casino) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Landmark (hotel and casino) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vami IV -- Vami IV (talk) 20:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Please note: the review has not failed. The article was moved from Landmark (hotel and casino) to Landmark Hotel & Casino, and the bot thought this meant that the abandoned review page (no such article any more) had failed. I have moved the review page to match the new article name, so a new "review" message may be generated below, and if the article moves again, more such messages may be generated. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Maggie Smith
Re your recent edits to Maggie Smith, you can find her DBE citation at https://www.thegazette.co.uk/London/issue/51981/supplement/1. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:53, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Sharon Tate
Hey Lemon, are this three pictures of Sharon Tate freely to use? In any case they should be nominated for deletion correct? I am currently out of commons, but hope you could do something if they are not allowed, or change the licenses:

Greetings. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Their sources are unclear, one came from Pinterest and another one from Blogspot (which is not advised per Wiki standards), lack of clear license, and thus they should be nominated for deletion. I'll deal with these pics immediately, no worries. Lemonreader (talk) 02:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Got ya bro, greetings. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 18:05, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Lemonreader,

This is to let you know that File:Annex - Stewart, James (Call Northside 777) 01.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 25, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-09-25. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 18:03, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hi Lemonreader,

This is to let you know that File:Sharon Tate Valley of the Dolls 1967 - Restoration.jpg, a featured picture you nominated, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for January 24, 2023. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2023-01-24. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 7.9% of all FPs 18:29, 31 May 2022 (UTC)