User talk:Leo067

October 2015
Hello, I'm Alpha Monarch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jonathan Noyce without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ♔ MONARCH Talk to me  08:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello Alpha Monarch I'm Leo067 and not very experienced in Wikipedia because I use it rarely. There is an explanation of the change, readable to everyone, maybe at the wrong place. Why didn't you ask me before you removed the change? I answer here because I don't want to copy your message to another place. 10:44, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Leo067, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Jonathan Noyce. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ♔ MONARCH Talk to me  07:46, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest editing
Hello, Leo067. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Jonathan Noyce, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies.

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 10:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Thanks for your message on my talk page and for declaring that you do not have a conflict of interest. The reason I asked is because Jonathan Noyce and Jethro Tull (band) are the only two articles you have edited and because some of the links you added (to Facebook and linked in pages for example) which do not meet the criteria of being reliable, independent, secondary sources are of the kind commonly added by editors with a conflict. I appreciate you clarifying.

I have left another message in the discussion on the talk page about why I have made the changes I have, and why the maintenance templates are on the page. These are not as you called them "error messages" - they are designed to flag to other editors that the article still has work to be done on it, and hopefully might even attract other editors to come and help edit and improve the page.

The main issue remains sourcing. Wikipedia works not by original research, but by including what has been previously published in reliable, independent sources. This means that if no such source exists, the content should not be included in the article. So as I see it there are two options at the moment to address the issue: either sources are found for the existing content flagged with "citation needed"; or the content is removed until sources can be found for it. Either of those two could then lead to the maintenance templates being removed from the top of the article. Thanks, Melcous (talk) 22:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

What.are you doing
...with Airbus A³ Vahana and Alpha and Beta? So we don't work at cross purposes, it would be helpful if you discuss it on the article's talk page first so you don't end up doing unnecessary work. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and taking advantage of the experience of other editors will help you work more efficiently. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 06:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

From looking at your new Beta article, all that can be covered in one article, and I've proposed a merge as such. Honestly, you ought to discuss things beforehand until you gain more experience on Wikipedia. Otherwise it's going to seem like everyone is against whatever you're doing, and that's not really the case. You don't need permission to do anything, but it does not help to make major decisions like splitting an article in two by yourself. - BilCat (talk) 07:13, 2 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I'm working for Wikipedia since January 2013, so I think this should be enough experience to continue. --Leo067 (talk) 21:06, 28 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Of course discussions are helpful and necessary many times, especially in case of major decisions. I sometimes wonder why others don't start one, if it's needed. Why didn't you start this discussion on ? --Leo067 (talk) 11:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Transition (aviation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Transition (aviation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Transition (aviation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:27, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vertihub


The article Vertihub has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is just recent jargon anticipating the future, per WP:NOTDICTIONARY, WP:TOOSOON and WP:CRYSTAL. Also referenced from dubious sources and clearly copied and badly translated from a German-language source, probably wikipedia.de"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Translating articles for other language Wikipedias to English
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from de:Vertiport to Draft:Vertiport. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:  It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted translated page template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:35, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
 * For more details on this, please see Help:Translation. In addition, you should also take a look at WP:OTHERLANGS as well for reference. The existence of a Wikipedia article about this topic on German Wikipedia does not automatically mean a corresponding article about the same topic should also exist on English Wikipedia. Each local Wikipedia project is separate distinct from the others, and each project has its own respective policies and guidelines. Since English Wikipedia is the largest of all the Wikipedias, many of the other Wikipedias have policies and guidelines that are sometimes exactly the same or quite similar to those of English Wikipedia; however, there can be some important differences as well. Moreover, since English Wikipedia has the largest community of editors, its policies and guidelines tend to be more rigorously applied and enforced than perhaps is done by the communities of other Wikipedias. So, just because an article about this subject matter exists on German Wikipedia, that doesn't mean it should exist; it's quite possible that the article was cimply never properly assessed and reviewed. Ultimately, your draft is going to be assessed in accordance with English Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, primarily Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Since the draft appears to fall within the scopes of Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation and Wikipedia:WikiProject Transport, those might be good places to ask for assistance. Even if it turns out that the subject matter is (at least now) not considered to be Wikipedia notable so that a stand-alone article can be written about it, it might be OK to add the content to an already existing article about a related topic. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Heliport. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2024 (UTC)