User talk:Lesath

Note
thank you for caring. DS (talk) 16:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back
I was over at User talk:DragonflySixtyseven about to give my condolences when I noticed that you mentioned your old username. Anyway, I supported one of your RfA's waaay back in the day and it is good to see you back on here. Cheers.  young  american (wtf?) 17:56, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pittsburgh, Brazil
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Pittsburgh, Brazil, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 00:23, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I would just like to add a note explaining the above warning, since I feel it would be bad form to delete it. Previously I didn't participate much in the Wikipedia community so I didn't think there was any need, but now that I've gotten involved in a few discussions it seems prudent. The article Pittsburgh, Brazil was created by my younger brother on my account as the result of a debate we were having. I don't even remember the details at this point, but he opened my laptop and created the article to "prove" to me that some person we were arguing about was actually from Brazil (and not Pittsburgh). It's unfortunate that this happened, and I realize I bear the responsibility for his intrusion into my account (since it can never be verified that he was the one who did it) but I have taken steps, such as enabling screenlocking, to ensure things like it won't happen again. -- ✶♏✶ 07:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Mind's Eye (book)


The article The Mind's Eye (book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * original research: unpublished source

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Racconish  Tk 06:33, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of The Mind's Eye (book)
I have nominated The Mind's Eye (book), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Mind's Eye (book). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Racconish  Tk 07:39, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:54, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Cape Feare Spoken Article
Hi, just wondering if you are still working on the Spoken Article version of Cape Feare. If not, I will be removing the article from the list in 7 days. Thanks! Cognate247 (talk) 03:36, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Revert
Sorry but what revert are you talking about. Please provide a link to the page. Thanks,-- Kangaroo powah  02:58, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, Its just that I wtch some spongebob and that seemed pretty accurate. Best, -- Kangaroo powah  05:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. When you recently edited Existence of God, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Good (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Missing Wikipedians
Hello, you've been mentioned on the missing Wikipedians page for while now, but I've just added your current username per this message on its talk page. Hope you don't mind. Graham 87 07:46, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * I found it through the message I linked on the missing Wikipedians talk page, and confirmed it using the message about your old username that you sent to another user (it's mentioned on the third section of your talk page). By the way, you technically don't qualify for the missing Wikipedians list anymore since you've just made an edit ... I'll remove you from there (or you can do it yourself) if you don't mind. Graham 87 04:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've gone ahead and done that. Graham 87 05:33, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

I'm the one who posted that message on Wikipedia talk:Missing Wikipedians, because I saw you mentioned your previous username on User talk:DragonflySixtyseven/Archive13. No, I wasn't aware of any issues that might make someone ban/block you – if it has anything to do with this, personally I doubt anything would come from something done nine years ago (and I gather from your Missing Wikipedians entry there was some conflict involved?), especially given all your great edits from 2009 onwards. Although I can't speak for all admins (and I am not one anyway), and therefore it might not have been a good judgement call. Double sharp (talk) 08:54, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

"Neurodiversity movement" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Neurodiversity_movement&redirect=no Neurodiversity movement] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. -- MikutoH talk! 01:21, 10 February 2024 (UTC)