User talk:Lexysexy

Welcome to Wikipedia
Mushroom (Talk) 10:43, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

reply
I don't recall making accusations Chingster (talk) 22:07, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

swords
That's useful to know. Thanks! (Now I know what to go looking for.) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 10:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Lexysexy, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Lexysexy/sandbox.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Removal of photograph
As far as I can see, this is a free file. It is not clear to me why the bot has removed it. Can you explain, please.Lexysexy (talk) 05:56, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The bot saw that the image was tagged with Non-free historic image. I don't know whether this correct; I suggest you ask at Media copyright questions. -- John of Reading (talk) 12:55, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I am not sure how that tag came to be applied, might be my lack of understanding of the wp processes. However, the photo is certainly out of copyright due age, has been in the public domain for years, and is necessary (I think) in my article. A photo from the same source can be found at the Lester Brain article - both men were Qantas pilots at the same time. Can I upload the photo again, rewriting the justification, or does the system prevent this?
 * There's no need to upload them again, as they haven't been deleted yet and can be re-tagged. I've asked for expert advice at WP:MCQ. -- John of Reading (talk) 08:01, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:AAKochQANTAS.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:AAKochQANTAS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi the template you need is The CC licenses are clearly invalid and fair use is not required. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, Graeme. However, my next step is still not clear to me - that is, do I reload the picture, using the template mentioned above, or can I reactivate the existing jpg, amending the current wrong material enroute? If I use that template, whereabouts? Sorry to be clueless, this is my first big attempt, and I'm learning on the trot.
 * You don't have to do anything, as Graeme has edited the three file pages to change the license tag. If you go to File:AAKochQANTAS.jpg you'll see that it now has a big explanation of Australisn public domain rules. Image description pages can be edited just like any other page by clicking the "Edit" tab at the top; the history shows the various tags being added and changed. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:58, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You can include the images in the articles again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Gentlemen. All seems to be in order again. Hopefully I'll get the article loaded soon. Cheers

Duplication removed
OK. I'm impressed. How did you spot that? Pdfpdf (talk) 12:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Possibly mis-spent youth, but more likely too much recent practice in proof-reading!Lexysexy (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I suggest you go with "mis-spent youth". (It sounds a lot more interesting than proof-reading.) Pdfpdf (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

666!
As one of a highly select international group, you are hereby invited to join me in celebrating my 666! (Let the games begin!) Pdfpdf (talk) 11:17, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Short Empire S23 Capella (A A Koch).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Short Empire S23 Capella (A A Koch).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Pdfpdf
Just noting that Pdfpdf wasn't the one that typed in an it was an IP vandal. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll answer here for convenience - the point is that "an" is the correct word in that phrase. 101 corrected the "a" that it seems likely pdf mistyped in the first place. That is why I rejected your revision. In any case 'It's a honour' is not English phraseology. Altho' I haven't bothered to look at his work, and I don't understand why he/she doesn't register, why do you call 101 a vandal?Lexysexy (talk) 00:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edna Nell Doig, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West End ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Edna_Nell_Doig check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Edna_Nell_Doig?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)