User talk:Liblarva

Regarding World of Warcraft
Good day. Please be careful when reverting other users edits, as your recent reversion to World of Warcraft back to your own version of the page also undid style/grammar changes as well as the content changes you seem to be disputing.

On the topic of the content dispute, please participate in discussions at Talk:World of Warcraft to gain consensus. Additionally, you may want to read WP:RS and WP:OR, which will help you to understand our guidelines for including content, and what makes a good citation. In particular, citing Wikipedia itself is not allowed. You should instead use the relevant citation from that article to back up your points.

Also, as a caution, if you continue to revert to your own version without engaging in discussions to gain consensus, you may be blocked. Please see our policy on edit warring here: WP:EDITWAR. You can also find out about our guidelines on how to gain consensus here: WP:CON.

Thanks for your contributions, I apologise if my reasoning when I undid your edits was confusing, but there was a lack of space in the edit summary box. Regards, -- Taelus  ( Talk ) 22:09, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) I am sorry I removed your hard work, but the content you are introducing at WoW is sourced to blogs and anon postings, and uses wp:weasel words. If you are interested in pursuing these changes, please join the discussion at the article page. wp:edit warring your changes into the article will not work, and will eventually lead to your being blocked from editing if you continue down this path.- Sinneed  22:11, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Removal of article tags, edit war
I did not place the tag. It was placed by another editor. I support it. There has been no discussion of removing it. Do not remove it again, until there is wp:consensus to do so. I removed the content because you removed the tag. You have restored the content. I will restore the tag. Leave it in.- Sinneed  05:41, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Equally, leave the content in until there is consensus. The dubious tag was inserted for different articles. As I said, I've found WP:RS for the assertion. If you continue, you only make it obvious that it's not about verifiability but your own opinion. Let a consensus decide.- — Preceding unsigned comment added by liblarva (talk • contribs)
 * "The dubious tag was inserted for different articles." - great, leave them in, and the content was, and is, in the article. Again, if you provide wp:edit summaries, it is more likely that your work will remain in the encyclopedia.  It is important to sign your posts.  See wp:talk page guidelines.  If you indent to standard, it makes it much easier to see what you have written.-  Sinneed  14:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

"In talk, you are only one wanting to remove content." - if you review carefully, you may find that I did not, until now, want to remove the content. It was tagged, adequately cautioning readers that it was dubious. You elected to (stealthily) remove the article tag. That is not generally a great idea.- Sinneed  05:49, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Your statements are false-to-fact. You removed content without discussion. Only after I reverted did you begin discussion.- — Preceding unsigned comment added by liblarva (talk • contribs)


 * On my talk page, you wrote,

"Warning. WP:EW, leave article alone until consensus is reached. Stop now."
 * Wikipedia works on wp:consensus and wp:be bold not on "mother may I". Please see wp:TE, and actually read wp:EW, and please, sign your talk page posts.
 * "You removed content without discussion." - Hmmm. In a sense, yes... you removed the article tag, stealthily... thus I removed the content to which the tag applied. If you remove the tag without wp:consensus again, I will immediately remove the content.  No problem.-  Sinneed  12:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Edit summaries and talk page signatures
Please remember to provide wp:edit summaries to explain what you are doing... this greatly increases the odds that changes you want to make will stay. Also, please be sure to sign your talk page posts.- Sinneed  22:15, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Idly
"So how do the Wikipedians decide what’s true and what’s not?" This is a fundamentaly foolish question, like asking an unmarried, petless female "When are you going to stop beating your wife and kicking your dog because you are an evil person?"

WP can't decide what is true or not true, only what does or does not appear in wp:reliable sources.- Sinneed  00:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)