User talk:LikesPickles

Welcome
Hello, LikesPickles and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students.

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text:  on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Dr Aaij (talk) 01:17, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, LikesPickles, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:09, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

Also...
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2018_Chemnitz_stabbing_attack&diff=858268486&oldid=858267653

16 October 2018
Six edits in the month of October--sorry, but in a writing class that won't do. I moved the tuner article into mainspace after cleaning it up a bit, so you have that, but right now that's all. You need an article, you need to nominate it; I can not see from your edits here that you are doing any work for this class at all. Dr Aaij (talk) 23:14, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Essay
,, poor old User:LikesPickles is supposed to review y'all's essays BUT YOU HAVE NO ESSAYS. This needs to be rectified soon. Dr Aaij (talk) 21:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * working on it but thought you said we had until tonight to post it.
 * Tonight is soon, --I was merely conveying the mild frustration felt by LikesPickles. Remember, others can't review until there's something to review, and Monday morning comes before you know it. Also, make sure you sign your messages--otherwise the ping doesn't work. Take care, Dr Aaij (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK
Hi! I saw your DYK nomination and wanted to ping your instructor,. I do have some notes:


 * Some parts of the article comes across as editorializing, such as the statement "despite the outlandish undertones". This is a personal statement and will be very subjective to the reader, as some may see it as outlandish while others may not. There's an overall issue with tone in the article that really needs to be dealt with - it doesn't really read as neutral.


 * I'd leave out the name of the persons who destroyed the trees. The vandalism is worth mentioning, but generally the names of the perpetrators aren't really necessary per WP:BLPNAME. Essentially, since these individuals are really only known for their own single events and would be considered, at least as far as Wikipedia is concerned, low profile individuals. It poses an issue of privacy as well, since there's a question of whether or not these individuals would receive any harm for being mentioned in the articles. (There's also a good argument to make that naming them in the article would really only serve to perpetuate any feelings of martyrdom or infamy that they may want to cultivate, so not naming them also kind of robs them of this - although this isn't a policy based argument per se.)
 * I've actually re-written these sections into a single section on vandalism since I'm concerned that it could pose a potential issue.


 * This has several run-on sentences that need to be edited for flow. Here's one example:
 * Toomer sold his pharmacy 1952 to a family outside of his own and nearly a decade after the pharmacy's purchase Auburn fans and students began to celebrate away games in 1962 by rolling the power lines outside of the pharmacy and the trees directly opposite, creating one of the oldest American football traditions there is.
 * This should be split into two sentences. I'd also either name the family or just mention that Toomer sold his pharmacy, as it would generally be assumed that the sale would be to someone unrelated. Also, be careful of repetition as far as names go - this isn't a huge issue, but it's something to watch out for in general when it comes to writing. I've fixed this sentence for you in the article and it now reads like this:
 * The pharmacy was later sold in 1952 by Toomer to Mac and Elizabeth Lipscomb, who chose against renaming the pharmacy. In 1962 Auburn fans and students began to celebrate away games by rolling the power lines outside of the pharmacy and the trees directly opposite.


 * Google map results like this are not reliable sources and I'd recommend that you use something like the official website or a secondary reliable source since Google results aren't always accurate. In this situation you were using it to back up the claim that the pharmacy and bank are landmarks. They're on the map, but so are a lot of other buildings and features that aren't necessarily landmarks. Also be careful of sourcing like this since it's seen as a self-published source and as such, we can't really verify what type of editorial oversight they use. There's also an issue in that the site is set up to sell the reader something, which is problematic in and of itself.
 * This could generally use more coverage as a whole - it's notable, but right now the bulk of the coverage deals with the trees and you need more that specifically cover Toomer's Corner.

I hope that this helps! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

This does help very much Shalor! Thank you very much! I will get on adding more and resolving the name issue. LikesPickles (talk) 20:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Toomer's Corner (Auburn, AL) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 18:24, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Toomer's Corner


The article Toomer's Corner has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Lack of encyclopedic notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:56, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Toomer's Corner for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toomer's Corner, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Toomer's Corner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 16 July 2022 (UTC)