User talk:Limhey

Welcome!
Hello, Limhey, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Grant Shapps. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Brustopher (talk) 22:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Limhey (talk) 13:06, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me with - at the top of the page regarding Professor Roy Meadow is a box stating the article has multiple issues. The concerns seem to be dated Dec 2011. I believe that those issues have been corrected; so how do you have the article re-assessed and/or remove the box?

Limhey (talk) 11:07, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
 * You may remove it yourself, but leave a message explaining why on the talk page if you believe the issues have been addressed. For further information reading WP:DETAG wouldn't hurt. Happy editing! -- Kethrus &#124;talk to me 12:03, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Many thanks Kethrus. Limhey (talk) 20:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hillsborough disaster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steven Cohen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy Meadow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Horton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Hillsborough
Apologies, I was probably wrong to remove your additions. What I have now done, since I saw that the material did not belong on the 'report' article, is slightly expand and rephrase your additions in the 2016 inquests section, which is where the three 'legal' contributions of the two doctors can be summarised (Taylor, Popper, 2016). Pincrete (talk) 18:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks but frankly you should have left it where it was as it related directly to and critical of the Popper inquests in the main. The dismissal of the evidence by Taylor no doubt contributed to Popper's decision but did not justify it. The outcome at Warrington where the evidence was looked at in closer detail backs up that view. (Limhey (talk) 20:45, 5 May 2018 (UTC))

Roma
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Vaselineeeeeeee★★★ 19:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

User:Vaselineeeeeeee Noted. An edit war needs at least two participants. Clearly I disagree totally with your Draconian edits and have put comments on wiki project football page. I wasn't aware that 'editing' amounted to deleting in such a unilateral sweeping self-righteous fashion. They say history is written by the victors and you certainly seem to prefer your overbearing opinions to win.(Limhey (talk) 19:46, 8 May 2018 (UTC))

Copyright problem on HMAS Nepal (G25)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.naval-history.net/xGM-Chrono-10DD-45N-Nepal-ex-Norseman.htm. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:23, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

This reads as quite courteous advice. Shame you describe it as a warning on your own talk. (Limhey (talk) 21:03, 5 October 2018 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HMS Cockade (R34), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluff ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/HMS_Cockade_%28R34%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/HMS_Cockade_%28R34%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Divock Origi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)