User talk:Lobo151

Welcome!
Hello, Lobo151, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 10:54, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Racing Point Force India) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Racing Point Force India, Lobo151!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Nice work. Well written article on a topic that is sure to be in the F1 news cycle this offseason."

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 15:13, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Unexplained section removal
In this edit you removed a sourced section without explanation. Please always add an explanation in the edit summary. Would you care to explain yourself now? Debresser (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I thought that I added WP:CRYSTALBALL as an explanation, but I didn't. Sorry for that. I think it is just speculation that the movie will be possible failing at the box office and Wikipedia shouldn't be a place for it. Who says it will not be the newest highest-grossing films movie.Lobo151 (talk) 20:35, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * If it is sourced, and it is just a line in a whole article, then I don't think WP:CRYSTALBALL is violated by it. Moreover, the speculation itself is likely to remain an interesting fact and part of the article, regardless of whether it becomes true or not. I'd reconsider this, if I were you. Debresser (talk) 22:31, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Well it is sourced by a James Bond fan site? "That’s the story according to British tabloid The Express who picked it up from famed Bond news website MI6 HQ" . It look like mutiple sources but it is based all on the same story from a James Bond fan site. So the original source, which is a fan site, is not even mentioned here, only different website who copied the same story. That original story itself claimed the calculation they made can be incorrect. It remains just speculation. All this consider, I think this is WP:CRYSTALBALL.Lobo151 (talk) 06:28, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. I understand what you are saying. Debresser (talk) 00:15, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

No Time To Die February to April 2020 release date change
My source for the statement that the release date was changed to April 2020 was the official making-of book, and I was just about to amend my edit to cite it as a source, when I checked Deadline to confirm it, and found the book is wrong. The release date was moved from Feb 2020 to April 2020 in Feb 2019, before filming even began, and well before Craig was injured. His injury had no impact on the release date. I was glad to see you undid my edit, I was about to undo it myself. jamesluckard (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2021 (UTC)


 * No problem, due to all changes I did some reaserch myself and never seen this reason before. Strange a official book has this wrong. But maybe they want to cover up some of the production issues they had.Lobo151 (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello @Lobo151,

I noticed you corrected a lot of the articles that I developed. Hence I wanted to take a minute to thank you. Best wishes. Filmman3000 (talk) 18:13, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

No Johnny English 4?
So RadioTimes, Digital Spy and Screendaily lie? Orastor (talk) 21:28, 10 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Nothing official and therefore no release date is known. Lobo151 (talk) 21:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * But it is indeed coming, we can say that much. Orastor (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No because that are only rumors and Wikipedia is not the place for rumors. Lobo151 (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Sebastiano Pigazzi/Bud Spencer
I think Pigazzi is ready to be created, I created only the wikilinks 2.237.220.21 (talk) 13:25, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Carlos Sainz Jr Full Name
Hello, I have seen that you have reverted the modification I had made to Carlos Sainz Jr’s page, which was adding his full name as he stated himself in numerous interviews.

I would like to understand why, could you please provide me with the reasons ?

kind regards,

Eliseue Eliseue (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, Check the note next to the name. It is already mentioned.Lobo151 (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Nyck de Vries - Revision removals
Hello Lobo151,

I am unhappy about you undoing my edits on the Nyck de Vries page. Given that it is a quasi-biography of his career, it makes sense to be able to read the article from the start of his career until the current moment. When reading chronologically, going from his 2024 WEC start with Toyota to...his F1 reserve status in 2020 makes little sense to me, hence why I changed it so that users would have a better understanding of his career progression.

It is also regrettable that your revisions removed my additional information on de Vries's ELMS career and his win at the 2024 6 Hours of Imola.

One final note: the vast majority of (at least your recent) edits have been of the "undid revision"-ilk. That could become boring after a while ;)

Have a good day/night,

DriverDatabase1 (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello,
 * The changes you made his page not better. For example split his WEC into 2 sperate makes it very unclear. If you want to read about his WEC you have to read it on 2 places? Also his F1 reserve status in 2020 is important.
 * Adding years in the current title would make it clear enough.
 * What has my previous edits to do with this discussion? What is the point of this comment?
 * Lobo151 (talk) 21:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)