User talk:Lord Voldemort



Archives: please see: ''
 * Oldest — contains my favorite exchange so far. Although, it could easily be this instead.
 * A little less old — contains SaltyPig's problem with Ann Coulter
 * ''A fair amount less old — contains the discussion surrounding my RfA from my talk page only.
 * Quite a bit less old — contains a yummy cookie. (Getting quite large. The archive, not the cookie.)
 * Basically not old at all
 * Truly not old at all
 * Future discussions?

Łóŗď Vòļđèmøřť
A much better spoiler template, IMHO:

Spoiler warning: Plot and/or ending details follow.

Just something to keep in mind. &#8756;--Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 20:17, 28 July 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
I appreciate this. I certainly have nothing against you personally or the idea of you being resysopped, but we've had several cases of "old crowd" admins returning after long periods of inactivity and being out-of-touch with what our policies and guidelines have become over the years. This is ultimately bad for the site (drama, disruption, often an ArbCom case) and for the returning admin (being dragged to ANI or ArbCom, sometimes even desysopped). I'd love to see you return to activity, including administrative activity once you've had a chance to re-acclimate yourself to the project. Many things have changed even since my join date (2015). If you need any help getting back up to speed, feel free to message me. ~ Rob 13 Talk 17:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)


 * No problem. You and Bbb23 made valid points, and I thought about it and reconsidered. Thanks. -- LV  (Dark Mark)  18:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature is also causing Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links.

You are encouraged to change
 * : -- LV (Dark Mark)

to
 * : -- LV (Dark Mark)

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Hufflepuff > Slytherin
Eh, why y'all slytherins gotta be so hypocritical? you're a half blood yourself! 2605:A000:EB47:F100:5D3D:8369:2E42:6BD7 (talk) 21:30, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Bad hat harry listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bad hat harry. Since you had some involvement with the Bad hat harry redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 08:31, 31 March 2018 (UTC)