User talk:Lquilter/Archive 017

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590227767 your edit] to Feminist science fiction may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 * and Fantasy Web Magazine and Source-books'&#39;. Fiction Book Reviews. "'Stand by for Mars!' review of '&#39;Women Scientists in Fifties Science Fiction Movies'&#39;" |publisher=
 * against considerable resistance. Reactions to

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fair use, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EFF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks much
Thanks for creating Freedom to Read Foundation.

Much appreciated,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 00:38, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Academic journals by commercial publishers
Category:Academic journals by commercial publishers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Folkways series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carey McWilliams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Not in Front of the Children
I've recently gone ahead and created an article about the book, Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth.
 * Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth

Help with suggestions for additional secondary sources would be appreciated at the article's talk page, at Talk:Not in Front of the Children: "Indecency," Censorship, and the Innocence of Youth.

Thank you for your time,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:52, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Report
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Freedom of Speech for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -buffbills7701
 * FYI, the interview link is at Wikipedia Signpost/2013-08-07/WikiProject report. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 02:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dowling v. United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Folsom v. Marsh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Copyright Act (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 5 March
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
 * On the United States courts of appeals page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598326988 your edit] caused a missing references list (help | help with group references) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F598326988%7CUnited States courts of appeals%5D%5D Ask for help])

Category:United States Section 230
Perhaps another name would be more appropriate: Category:Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (to match the parent article), or something else. I'm posting on your talk page so we can possibly get agreement for a speedy rename. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 21:29, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * I thought about it, but went with the shorter. I'm only slightly in favor of the shorter. If you want to do a speedy rename I won't stand in the way.  Thanks for caring.  (-:  --Lquilter (talk) 00:07, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=598781162 your edit] to Marjorie Heins may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Marjorie Heins b.1946 is a lawyer,

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=599673422 your edit] to Copyright Society of the U.S.A. may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Donald Brace, one of the founders of the Harcourt, Brace & Co. publishing company), http://www.csusa.org/?page=Brace "Donald C. Brace Memorial Lecture", CSUSA website (last visited

Notability discussion
Lquilter, thanks for your comments at Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics). I'm wondering, though, whether you really intended to paste a copy of my recommendations below your comments. It looks at first glance like someone's unsigned comment. RockMagnetist (talk) 14:27, 7 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Nope; thanks for noticing. I had copied it to my notepad for review while I was editing the comment & must have hit paste by accident. All cleaned up. --Lquilter (talk) 15:40, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Common law copyright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Preemption (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry
Hi, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:44, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Pride 2014
Hi Lquilter. In case you are not aware, there is an upcoming campaign to improve coverage of LGBT-related topics on Wikipedia, culminating with an international edit-a-thon on June 21. See Wiki Loves Pride 2014 for more information. If you are interested, you might consider creating a page for a major city (or cities!) near you, with a list of LGBT-related articles that need to be created or improved. This would be a tremendous help to Wikipedia and coverage of LGBT culture and history. Thanks for your consideration, and please let me know if you have any questions! -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:46, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of United States Supreme Court copyright case law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laches (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Laches (equity)
InB4 you! Please harmonize your edit with my recent mention of the same case (under Examples). Thanks. Spike-from-NH (talk) 22:42, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

- Okay, done. I kept it in the statute of limitations section (where I put it), because there is a specific section for that issue. I used some of your wording & included the cornell case cite (thanks for that). btw, you had a typo on "rebuffed the plaintiff"; laches of course was raised by the D. ... happy to find other editors who work on these fields; do you do a lot on copyright or legal doctrines? or was this a chance edit on your part? --Lquilter (talk) 12:40, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the merge. You are right about the defendant!  I don't work Wikipedia legal issues (have recently been working on football and basketball rules), but I always review Supreme Court opinions at LII, had to come here to find out what "laches" was, and thought the new decision (and the fact that the laches issue was debated in the dissent) broke new ground.  Spike-from-NH (talk) 12:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, I really appreciate your interest & work on it. Thanks! (Yeah, laches is one of my more favorite doctrines.  Just for fun, check out adverse possession, another old common law doctrine that I enjoy.) --Lquilter (talk) 13:45, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Ouch! Conditions under which possession is ten-tenths of the law! I don't think squatters should be rewarded.  My favorite doctrine is judicial estoppel.  I learned about it, regarding the Portsmouth Naval Shipyard, which is not in Portsmouth but on an island in the river and nominally part of Maine (which is the only way to reach it), when New Hampshire saw fit to argue both sides of the question in two different lawsuits against Maine.  I thought it was an important principle that could potentially impede people who want to have things both ways; it should have been used against Obama-care, except that the continual claim that it wasn't a tax did not go into a lawsuit.  Spike-from-NH (talk) 18:20, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Oh, no, property law wants to reward active uses, rather than "dead hand" control. There are lots of good reasons -- economics and efficiency among them -- for doctrines like adverse possession. --Lquilter (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * And maybe the robber can use the cash better than the "dead hand" of the bank, but the result is not more "efficient" than property rights that can be counted on. But to return to the business of this site: Good work at Judicial estoppel — but do you agree that the reference I removed, though it relates to the previous reference, does not have anything to do with estoppel?  Spike-from-NH (talk)


 * Real property != cash in a bank, right? Each form of property has a variety of doctrines specific to it, aimed at making it function.  The point with real property is that if it's unoccupied such that its owner-of-record doesn't even notice that it's being used for decades, then title needs to move on; the longer records sit, the harder ownership questions become to disentangle. So possession is 9/10 of the law makes a lot of sense.  -- As for judicial estoppel, I didn't check on your edit. I'm noting now that if you mention a case you should cite to it. --Lquilter (talk) 12:33, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The Piscataqua River border dispute I mention in Judicial estoppel cites two cases (and one consent decree), and I linked there for the details — and have just edited it to use a footnote rather than an in-line citation, following your example. Tell me if you meant something more specific.  I am not trained to document cases with new Wikipedia pages, as you are doing.
 * My bank-robbery analogy is inexact but adequate: Whether either form of property is used as a store of value rather than actively is the owner's option. Not just squatters but third parties can always rationalize a subjectively "better" use of property.  Spike-from-NH (talk) 19:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I'll check the page. As for the other subject, you might enjoy reading about the theory of property.  There's no inherent reason, for instance, which property would "survive" after death or if it's not being used; that's just a customary set of rules we've come to adopt from some (not all) legal traditions.  But in all systems that have those forms of property, that can effectively create controls over property long after the person who wanted those controls on, there are ways to get rid of those rules.  Rule against perpetuities is a classic example to get rid of dead hand control; and doctrines like adverse possession are there also, for hundreds of years.  ... They're economically efficient because it's actually very difficult to track transfer of titles once it gets over a few decades; so every time you wipe the slate & start clean, you're making the system work more smoothly. It's part of incentives in law to keep the legal system functioning, and to keep property fresh rather than stale. --Lquilter (talk) 23:18, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Organizations opposed to women&#39;s suffrage
Category:Organizations opposed to women&, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 22:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Constructed language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to New Yorker


 * Ithkuil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to New Yorker


 * Láadan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to New Yorker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Lists of people by sexuality
Category:Lists of people by sexuality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 15:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

help
this is a test edit -- can you help me? Lquilter (talk) 16:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Fiona Ellis
Any specific pages you can request for our wiki edits? Fellis82 (talk) 16:57, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Laura! Lavoiekh (talk) 16:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hello
This is a test. I like editing wikis Janejanef (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

This is Harold
Just wanted to say hello!

HalSmitty (talk) 17:02, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

LIS 493
LIS-493 Kate Test KZdepski (talk) 17:03, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

What's going on with LIS 493?
So, I just blocked for 24 hours for trolling on Jimbo's talk page. I noticed on the IP's contributions page that there's some sort of note in the contribution page header indicating that a different IP address is a student in LIS 493, with a link back to Education Program:Simmons College/Intellectual Freedom - LIS 493 (Summer 2014). Any idea what's going on there? Cheers! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 19:56, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

And...I just ran across a thread on this over at the Help Desk. Looks like I'm not the only one scratching my head over this: Help desk. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 20:03, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Weird. I don't know!  I have 5 students & they all set up user accounts, and were all novices.  As to "a student in the class" -- when I was setting up the course page today, I clicked on "add a student", and tried to add myself; when I saved, it listed that IP address.  I tried then to delete the IP address ("remove from course") -- have tried twice! -- and it won't delete.  --Lquilter (talk) 20:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC) ** posting this on the Help desk page too. --Lquilter (talk) 20:12, 14 June 2014 (UTC)


 * It looks like someone has fixed the problem, whatever it was. Cheers! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 20:15, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

US TM SCt list
I think that's an excellent idea. Unfortunately I'm utterly swamped at the moment. I'll put it on my list of things to take a crack at in the near future. Absentminded (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Yeah, well, my life just went pear-shaped for the next week or so. So I may not get further on this until after the first week or two in July.  ... In the meantime, I wonder if someone will feel inspired to create an article for the TTAB's decision on the Washington Redskins name controversy -- if nobody else does I may, because it's pretty significant. --Lquilter (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Class token
I was looking at your course on intellectual freedom and would like to enroll.

~*~ Twilight~*~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilightofmymind (talk • contribs) 06:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi -- It's a class taught at Simmons College, in the graduate library school program -- so you'd have to make quite the commitment. (-: Sorry -- I'll make it clear on the course materials that this is related to a specific graduate program, not a class open to the world. --Lquilter (talk) 12:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Garvan Murtha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thirteenth Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Leffingwell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages PS1, P.S.1 and Michael Tracy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Personal infoboxes in relation to patriotism and nationalism
Hi Lquilter,

I saw your name on the WikiProject Discrimination listing.

There is a discussion at Template talk:Infobox person suggesting a change of emphasis to a Citizenship entry from the Nationality entry.

The idea is to give more facilitation to Patriotism instead of Nationalism and also to allow more freedom of expression in regards to terminologies used.

Contributions are welcomed but may be worth checking last edit to check progress first :) Regards Gregkaye (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of European scholars on matters of Information law


The article List of European scholars on matters of Information law has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Listcruft. The list is of interest to a very limited number of people and would not be expected to be included in an encyclopaedia. The list's membership is volatile and requires a disproportionate amount of effort to keep up to date.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Edcolins (talk) 20:50, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Howdy!
This is Thea! Plz add me as a ducklingThea.atwood (talk) 16:21, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charleston, South Carolina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Cards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

New England Wikipedia Day @ MIT: Saturday Jan 18
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

You're invited!
(You can unsubscribe from future notifications for Boston-area events by removing your name from this list.)

Thoughts on categorization
Hello: I saw your comments at []. I am writing an article (several actually) about a small mammal(s) of the Pacific Northwest (mostly Oregon) and need some help with categorization. Should I go ahead and create Category:Fauna of the Pacific Northwest? The article in question is Creeping vole. The current system as I see it would have it categorized into ecoregions of the US and Canada separately. Thank you. &mdash; Gaff ταλκ 05:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi -- When I check Category:Pacific_Northwest, it looks like there are several regional "fauna of" subcategories already -- maybe one of them meets your needs? If not, then do create it.  And if you run into problems ping me again -- I'm happy to weigh in on discussions. --Lquilter (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2014 (UTC)