User talk:Luce Fonrose

Welcome!
Hello, Luce Fonrose, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:06, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.
Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Luce Fonrose/sandbox Title IX
Please don't put personal pages, sandboxes or otherwise, in the main article namespace. It is considered vandalism. — Smjg (talk) 23:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Page titles
Hi, Luce Fonrose. When you move a page, the title needs to be changed from the original (e.g. Luce Fonrose/sandbox) to The eventual article title. Since there is unlikely to be an article at the title "Luce Fonrose/sandbox", the software will let you complete the move. See here for what that looks like. also, you should only move your sandbox into the mainspace when you are ready for what you've written to be read by many people. The student training on moving out of your sandbox should be helpful when that time comes. Do you have questions about anything else? Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 12:32, 1 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, the problem is I can't change the name at all. I am trying to, I read somewhere that said that I could get someone to possibly move it for me. I'm just not to sure on what to do and how to do it Luce Fonrose (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay. I can move your sandbox for you, but you can also create a page like User:Luce Fonrose/Title IX just by clicking on that page, adding some text and saving it. You won't "move" that work to the mainspace when you're done (instead you'll copy it over when you add to the article), since there is already an article on Title IX (unlike if you were to create a brand new article), but it's a standalone specific draft space. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! Luce Fonrose (talk) 01:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi Luce, I am reaching out to other classmates to please look at my page julex1524 Politcal Sociology and check my edits. Also if you can give any and all help in how you are finding your way through the directions. Thank you I appreciate it, Heidi Julex1524 (talk) 17:43, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.
Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 21:37, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please tell me what training assignment that is? I thought I did all of them. Thank you.

Luce Fonrose (talk) 21:41, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

You have an overdue training assignment.
Please complete the assigned training modules. --Locnamehn (talk) 19:08, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Peer Review
Hi Luce! This is Eacat27 (Emily) from class and I have read through your article on Title IX and will be doing a peer review. Since nothing has been assigned to peer review yet, I just decided to choose which articles I wanted to tackle. This is an already extensive article in terms of the information already on the page, but your edit so far fits in really well with the article. First, in terms of the lead section of the article, it is concise and to the point. It lets the reader know what Title IX is, who introduced it, and what it does. The article’s structure is very clear and easy to read and it is also balanced in terms of the information presented in each section. When reading through it, I didn’t find some sections to be disproportionately too extensive or brief, which is a positive thing. The list of sources or “Notes” is very extensive, with nearly 100 references added- wow! They, generally, look like reliable sources and specifically in your edit in the “Controversy” section of the article, the source you used was current, cited properly (the link took me right to the article, no problem), and seemed to provide useful information for you in your contribution. In terms of strengths specifically with what you have worked on thus far, I would say your edit was a strong, current addition to the “Controversy” section. It was also a great location for this edit, meaning not only in this section of the article but also in chronological order by event date because it was added after a section discussing something in 2010. A suggestion for this particular edit would be to make sure to read it through and use appropriate punctuation. For example, a comma after “…which mentioned Title IX,” and possibly change the wording in, “to prevent any sexual violence from happening to begin with” from “to begin with” to “in the first place.” Some suggestions that I would give for future edits would be to possibly find more court cases where Title IX came into play, and look into expanding upon the section “Impact on female athletics” as it is not as current with information. Although this is already a lengthy, extensive article, I think that your future edits will help improve this article even more! Eacat27 (talk) 14:16, 3 July 2016 (UTC)