User talk:Luigi.a.cruz

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. If you are looking for help, please do any of the following:
 * visit the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have
 * type   on your user page, and someone will answer your questions shortly
 * visit the directory of help pages

There are a lot of standards and policies here, but as long as you are editing in good faith, you are encouraged to be bold in updating pages. Here are a few links you might find useful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which produces your name and the current date. Also, it would be a huge help if you could explain each of your edits with an edit summary. Again, welcome! - 上村七美 | talk 01:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image copyright problem with Image:Old.Seagate.logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Old.Seagate.logo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Hard.drive.by.Western.Digital.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Hard.drive.by.Western.Digital.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:00, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Old.Western.Digital.logo.2.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Old.Western.Digital.logo.2.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Old.Western.Digital.logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading File:Old.Western.Digital.logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to Sharon Cuneta
Please remember not to mark edits that add content to articles as minor. Please see here for more information. Cheers, Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 14:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Friendly tip
You might want to avoid writing your email addresses so explicitly on your userpage, as there are programs that crawl the web searching for email addresses they can add to spam lists. See Address munging for some workarounds, or consider enabling email directly through Wikipedia as described at WP:EMAIL. Adrian J. Hunter(talk•contribs) 15:26, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Regarding Wikipedia's policy on copyright
There's a reason that there is such a strict policy. Copyright is something that is legally binding and we have to make sure that we're not infringing copyright by placing such media on Wikipedia or other Wikimedia sites. Also, Wikipedia is a 'free encyclopedia' under the GNU GFDL license which means that it's supposed to be not copyrighted. Just to let you know why, GB 86 01:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Regarding your recent edits to IA-32
Hello, Luigiacruz

I'm writing about your 23 May edit to IA-32 article. You have changed the article's style from one approved form to another. Not that I object much in this case, but I thought I'd let you know that Wikipedia:Manual of Style § Stability of articles prohibits such edits. So, please think twice before doing such edits again. Fleet Command (talk) 13:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

P.S.: Oh, and by the way, please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Fleet Command (talk) 13:02, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Windows XP. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 09:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * AussieLegend is right, but not just about that article. You really need to use Edit Summary a lot more often. Fleet Command (talk) 22:16, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, im advertising for myself
hi, i think main idea abt this algo could lead us to a linear time, evn for the worst case, by considerring 2 groups of 4 pivots, 2 from each group (2 groups of 2 pivots n produce the next 2 pivots 4 the group-double). i think in this current configuration, BFPRT median of medians looks more like N^(log_5(3)) guard assured which is not linear (worst case not linear) Florin Matei,Romania 93.118.212.93 (talk) 04:51, 9 October 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.118.212.93 (talk)

Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs
Hi.

I saw your 15:46, 15 September 2013 edit on Windows Fundamentals for Legacy PCs and I am afraid this is not true at all. Windows XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1, all editions of Windows Server, Windows 2000 and all Windows 9x let user do that. Windows 3.1 is not an OS but it allows that too.

Best regards, 18:50, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=589780921 your edit] to Computer may have broken the syntax by modifying 24 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Documentation is awaiting your perusal
Hi.

You've been here since 2006 and have over 1500 edits. I think it is high time you took a look at Help:Cheatsheet and Help:Referencing for beginners.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 18:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Masturbation, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neil N  talk to me 16:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Are old Autodesk logos really relevant to Autodesk?
For historical purposes. Luigi.a.cruz (talk) 17:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

What was the RAMAC price and capacity?
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Hard_disk_drive. Please help end the duologue on capacity and price of the IBM RAMAC Model 350 disk file. Thanks. Tom94022 (talk) 21:55, 4 September 2014 (UTC)''

Join WikiProject Microsoft!
 Why don't you join WikiProject Microsoft? It seems that you have been editing Microsoft-related articles, so why don't you consider joining WikiProject Microsoft, not to be confused with WikiProject Microsoft Windows. WikiProject Microsoft is a group of editors who are willing to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Microsoft, its technologies, Web-based sites and applications, its important people, and share interests regarding Microsoft. This WikiProject is in the process of being revived and is welcoming any and all editors who are willing to help out with the process. Add your name to the list at WikiProject Microsoft/Participants and/or add the userbox. Thanks! STJMLCC (talk) 19:53, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=643978389 your edit] to DDR2 SDRAM may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * 1/Desktop-font-b-ddr2-b-font-ram-font-b-4gb-b-font-font-b-ddr2-b.jpg Memory module for desktop PC DDR2-800, 4 GiB, Kingston.]

Office 2010
Hi.

I've reviewed your edits in Microsoft Office 2010 article. It seems your intentions were to improve accuracy but you ended up doing the opposite.

For example, you have added "x64 version of" to "A 64-bit version of Office 2010 is available, although not for x64 version of Windows XP or Windows Server 2003." But now, the sentence does not rule out that a 64-bit version might be available for IA-32 versions of Windows XP and Windows Server 2003. Longer is not always better.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 11:05, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

OK. Luigi.a.cruz (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm Smuckola. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Talk:Solid-state drive, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message here. ''Please stop adding trivia or original research to an encyclopedia. This is just useless junk and will be reverted. Please read these very very thoroughly, several times if needed, because they are a lot for anybody to take in: WP:TRIVIA WP:NOTFORUM WP:N WP:OR. Also, all of your edit descriptions are identical and meaningless, akin to "I just changed something" or "insert edit message here". Please don't ever make an edit that isn't essential, reliably sourced, and thoroughly described and justified in the description. Some of your contributions have been valuable. Thanks.''  — Smuckola(talk) 18:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You have been advised for literally a decade to use proper edit messages. All you did was change from one meaningless, generic, static, edit message to another one.  Do not make any more edits without describing the content or nature of your edit, and directly justifying why the edit was truly necessary to the encyclopedia, such as establishing WP:N notability. Your actions are confusing, and waste the energy of other editors. Please stop adding WP:TRIVIA WP:NOTMANUAL WP:NOTHOWTO WP:OR even if WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, as you did with this. Stop writing up your own ideas, and stop adding any information that isn't WP:N according to secondary WP:RS reliable sources, as you correctly did here. Your lack of a discussion here, and instead giving a stubbornly defiant statement on your user page (which is Wikipedia's property, not a user's own weblog or personal repository of stuff) shows that you think that we're just giving you suggestions.  We are not.  We are clearly giving you direct links to the policy and guidelines defining what an encyclopedia is and is WP:NOT. All editors absolutely must read and understand those. Editors can be blocked for doing what you've been warned against, and there's no reason for that to have to happen. You're clearly capable of good research and citations (although please use proper templates like Template:cite web). Thanks. — Smuckola(talk) 21:41, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EComStation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MBR. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Idiot box. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
You literally have dozens of edits with one of two summaries, both of which are about as helpful as saying "I edited something." Perhaps a bit more descriptive summaries would be for the better. Or, well, you might as well leave no summary at all, really. Reil (talk) 22:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

As you have been warned countless times for a decade, you can be blocked for refusing to address grievances on your talk page, and for violating the requirement of edit messages. You clearly know better, as you complied at one point; you are clearly reading these warnings, as you sulked publicly on your User page. You will speak to people on your talk page, and you will write completely thorough and explicit edit messages that describe what you changed and the rationale for why it was encyclopedically necessary according to policies such as WP:N. This is a serious warning. — Smuckola(talk) 03:04, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Windows XP Professional x64 Edition has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Auric   talk  16:52, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2018
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. DangleSnipeCelly (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2018 (UTC)

September 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Irrational number, you may be blocked from editing. ''It should not take over a decade of warnings for you to understand WP:NOTAFORUM. What you posted was not even correct.'' Jasper Deng (talk) 06:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Reliable sources
Hello. I wanted to explain why I reverted an edit of yours. The problem is that you cited the IMDb. Please don't cite the IMDb or import its data into Wikipedia, especially in a biography of a living person. The IMDb is a useful external link, but it is user-generated, which means it can't be cited on Wikipedia. Reliable sources should be staffed by professional journalists or academics, have a history of fact-checking, and editorial oversight. Websites like the IMDb, while useful as a casual resource, fail this requirement. This is very important in biographical articles because we need high quality sources to make sure that our information is correct. Crowd-sourced information should never be added to these articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Can you please just block this guy as the definition of WP:NOTHERE? — Smuckola(talk) 11:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Smuckola, we're here to help each other, not to discriminate and not to be judgmental. Luigi.a.cruz (talk) 11:39, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Luigi.a.cruz, you should spend some time reading the various policies and guidelines that people have linked on your talk page. Everyone makes mistakes, and Wikipedia can be very confusing for people who are not well-versed in Wikipedia's technical and social antecedents.  If you continue like this, you'll probably be blocked.  I don't understand why you're treating the entirety of English Wikipedia as if it's a sandbox or why you're leaving little comments and notes in encyclopedia articles.  If you meant to engage in clean up, please see Cleanup for instructions and help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:50, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You don't understand? I do. It's because WP:CIR WP:NOTHERE WP:TEND. We are ten years past the point of endless blockable offense. — Smuckola(talk) 21:34, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Pachelbel's Canon in Lemmings?
Where did you get the information that Pachelbel's Canon is included in Lemmings? I have played through every single level of the Amiga version and none have had the Canon as the background music. J I P &#124; Talk 22:00, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

August 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nintendo VS. System. — Smuckola(talk) 11:15, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ref vs Clarify
Hi there. Just wanted to make you aware that I have removed, but I believe I have while maintaining your original intention. I'm assuming you meant to clarify, not ref. Seems like it has been a, so just want to make sure it's clear. (although, beyond me why it was necessary to warn you previously) -  Skipple  ☎  20:55, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Efn vs Clarify
Hello, Luigi. This is almost the exact same message you received in April of last year (see above), as you seem to have not yet grasped the different purposes of these tags. When you add a &lt;ref> tag it is to point to a source. Use the tag to add an explanatory footnote; that it, you are  the reader something beyond what is in a source citation. What you very want to use, it seems, is the tag, which lets you insert a question for other editors to (we hope) eventually notice and clarify.

I just replaced one such of your additions to Xiaomi from New Year's Day. Over at NTFS, one of your additions of an from today was edited within an hour to clarify the text, but you should have used  there. The edit you labelled "Added explanatory footnote..." actually one, so well done there.

Also, when you do use in the correct way, there should be a section like Notes which contains the  tag. This lets people see all the explanatory footnotes on the page in one section, usually above the References section.

Please pay more attention to the details of these things. Wikipedia has lots of complicated nooks and crannies, but since you use (and misuse) these things so often, it would worthwhile to learn the differences and their proper use. Happy editing&mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 00:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)