User talk:Luis9595

April 2018
Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Arsène Wenger, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hugo Lloris, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

March 2019
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Shoreham-by-Sea, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.
 * You reverted a properly summaried editor's change, and did not provide an edit summary of your own. This action if repeated can be seen as disruptive, and ultimately warring. You have changed place-to-London distances in other articles. Please be aware that MOS states that distances between two points are by straight line, to make them comparable with other distances throughout all Wikipedia articles; anything other than straight line makes such useful comparison meaningless. There are web pages that will help you provide these London distances, London being centred on Charing Cross: such as this. Acabashi (talk) 10:40, 5 March 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at European Union. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 23:51, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to European Union, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Frenzie23 (talk) 14:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 14:41, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Edit Warring at European Union
I have had no choice but to report you to admins for edit warring at European Union. I and many other editors have reverted your edits and asked you to take your reasons for your edits for discussion to the talk page. You have failed to do this and persist in edit warring. This is against Wikipedia policy WP:WAR. It doesn't matter whether you believe you are right and we are all in the wrong you have been asked to discuss the issue at the article's talk page and this you must do. Unfortunately a temporary block on you editing seems to be the only sanction that is possible because you will not offer due respect to both other editors and Wikipedia policies. Please read the policies of Wikipedia and specifically the one on edit warring so you understand why this situation has arisen and how you should act as an editor in the future. Robynthehode (talk) 14:59, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at European Union. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 15:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:35, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

How will you resolve an editing dispute in the future? 331dot (talk) 16:02, 2 February 2020 (UTC) I will use the talk page


 * Please could you consider partial blocks next time? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:27, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * , sure. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 22:11, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy has been accepted
 List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=List_of_Italy_international_footballers_born_outside_Italy help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:39, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy


The article List of Italy international footballers born outside Italy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "An indiscriminate list. People with no connection with Italy gaining citizenship to play football for the national team might be a notable topic, but simply being born abroad is not."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Pontificalibus 08:36, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017–18 Arsenal F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stratford ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2017%E2%80%9318_Arsenal_F.C._season check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2017%E2%80%9318_Arsenal_F.C._season?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2016–17 Leeds United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sutton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

Great work!
User:Luis9595, I want to thank you for the great work you are doing at Category:Basketball players from New York City. If you are interested, I've started doing the same at Category:Basketball players from Los Angeles.--User:Namiba 18:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Category:Basketball players by city or town in the United States has been nominated for discussion
Category:Basketball players by city or town in the United States has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SportsGuy789 (talk) 20:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * You should probably stop applying this category until the CfD discussion is resolved. Rikster2 (talk) 14:17, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Basketball players from New York City


A tag has been placed on Category:Basketball players from New York City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_March_10. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:00, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:PlayStation Now games has been nominated for deletion
Category:PlayStation Now games has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 15:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheWikiholic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glasgow_Underground:_The_Glasgow_District_Subway Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheWikiholic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Glasgow_Underground:_The_Glasgow_District_Subway reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheWikiholic (talk) 15:11, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway
Hello, Luis9595. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway


Hello, Luis9595. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Glasgow Underground: The Glasgow District Subway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 15:12, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)