User talk:Lukepicardkirk

Welcome![edit]

Hi Lukepicardkirk! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 20:28, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Randy Pitchford, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Drmies (talk) 20:37, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 18:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lukepicardkirk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Just bored... (talk) 15:54, 28 January 2021 (UTC) who did I offend? I am pretty new at this, just bored working at home like most people.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:14, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you're not that named user, you'll have to explain why you attempted to log on as that user repeatedly. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:08, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Were you as bored as User:HoneyCrispAppleMan? Drmies (talk) 17:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who honeycrispappleman is, I think I understand why I was blocked. I will try and make more useful comments? I was looking over student loan stuff and reading up on Sallie Mea. Just bored... (talk) 18:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lukepicardkirk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Just bored... (talk) 18:27, 28 January 2021 (UTC) I understand that my friends and I should not have been editing wikipedia the way we were. I do not like being accused that I am a somebody else, but I understand Drmies concerns. I can assure you I am not honeycrispappleman. I will work to make more subjective changes to wikipedia in the future. Is that enough? I am not sure how to make this better.[reply]

Decline reason:

You'll need to explain why you attempted to repeatedly attempted to log in to that account before you logged into this one on January 22. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi --jpgordon I did not attempt to log into an account? Do you know where that login happened? I am in Washington DC I might need to change my password? Just bored... (talk) 19:15, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have just changed my password. I do not recognize some of the changes attributed to my account. Thank you for flagging

Yeah no. See WP:CHECKUSER to see how and what we know. And if you do not recognize changes attributed to your account, then you should be advised that we do not unblock compromised accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 19:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey --jpgordon thank you for this. Do you suggest I just create a new account? I have changed my password but I should just abandon my account. Thanks for working with me on this.

Hello

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lukepicardkirk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here It looks like my account was compromised. I would like to start a new one but when I try to set up a new account it tells me my account is locked. I assume this is my IP address? I have changed the password on this account, but would like to start a new one. How can this happen? Thanks! Just bored... (talk) 21:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your account was not compromised. You're simply using multiple accounts, either through sock puppetry or meat puppetry. If you create a new account, it will be immediately blocked as yet another sock puppet, so don't do that. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't even understand how NinjaRobotPirate you can have multiple accounts but fine, its not the end of the world. I will go back to my real job.