User talk:Lumican

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!
Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:
 * Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
 * You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
 * We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
 * We write for a general audience. Every reader should be able to understand anatomical articles, so when possible please write in a simple form—most readers do not understand anatomical jargon. See this essay for more details.

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --Tom (LT) (talk) 07:05, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 May
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Adult stem cell page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=660704291 your edit] caused a DOI error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F660704291%7CAdult stem cell%5D%5D Ask for help])

Undoing a revision in Hyaluronan
Hello, Lumican. You undid both of my modifications in revision 666535275 of the Hyaluronan - Biological synthesis saying "original was correct." Here are my problems with this:

For one modification you undid, the reference has the number as "5 X 10(5)" which, AFAIK, translates to 500,000 with 5 zeros not 4, =500k. You may see it by putting "5*10^5" into Google. Before my revision, wiki has the number as "50kDa".

For the other modification, the reference indicates "... exposure to exogenous HA, showing a stimulation of HA synthesis with preparations of weight-average molecular weight (Mw) greater than 5 X 10(5) in a concentration dependent manner. HA preparations with Mw less than 5 X 10(5) showed little or no effect except at high concentrations where a suppression of biosynthesis was observed." In short, it says that there is stimulation with MW > 5 X 10(5), and suppression with MW < 5 X 10(5). Before my revision, wiki says "There is feedback inhibition of hyaluronan synthesis by high molecular weight hyaluronan (>50kDa) ...". The way I see it, it is the opposite of the reference statement.

Please correct me if I'm wrong, or let's keep my revision. Thank you for your cooperation in the efforts of free information with accuracy.

--BeTTaHarmony (talk) 19:12, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi BeTTaHarmony, are you okay with this edit, a compromised statement? Just clarified that it is only at high concentrations for LMW HA and stimulatory with HMW HA. Lumican (talk) 22:02, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I think that's better. Please be more careful when deciding to cancel the contributions of others. Thank you. --BeTTaHarmony (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!