User talk:LunafreyaLaphicet

Welcome!
  Hello, !  Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

  Getting Started

Tutorial Learn everything you need to know to get started. Introduction to contributing • Editing

• Referencing

• Images

• Tables

• Policies and guidelines

• Talk pages

• Navigating

• Manual of Style

The Teahouse Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips 
 * Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
 * It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
 * If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes ( ~ ), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
 * When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
 * If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
 * Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, wizzito  &#124;  say hello!  06:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Leni Robredo
Removing lead citations is fine, but that content needs to be cited somewhere in the body. I didn't find a citation in the body for the birthdate. Please make sure all that content is cited. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 01:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Um, before I would talk about the citation, I would like to ask; is it appropriate to talk about article improvements on either the user talk page or on the article talk page? I'm still new at around 30 edits on my account. LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 01:42, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * It's OK as long as you are not wp:CANVASING, socking, forum shopping, etc. Asking what and how to cite is fine. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 01:58, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Short descriptions
Your recent edits adding short descriptions do not improve the articles at all. Per WP:SDNONE it is better for them to be left that way. 0x Deadbeef 09:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @0xDeadbeef Understood. Do you think it's appropriate to instead place a WP:COMMENT on articles indicating that it should not have short descriptions per WP:SDNONE? LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 09:51, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think it is necessary, but if you want to remind other people, then go for it. You gotta fix all these edits changing everything back to . If you think it is tedious, I can help you using an automated editing tool. 0x Deadbeef  09:53, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @0xDeadbeef What tool? LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 09:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * WP:JWB. 0x Deadbeef 09:56, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not on the JWB checklist, meaning that I can't use WP:JWB. LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 10:11, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes. I can use JWB, if you find manually editing tedious. 0x Deadbeef 10:12, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
 * In that case, I would like you to revert such edits while also adding the WP:COMMENT indicating WP:SDNONE. LunafreyaLaphicet (talk) 10:16, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

References restored after 31 December deletion
Hi. I restored three references which you deleted from the People Power Revolution article. They now have archive URLs, which addresses any issue of Link Rot. Link rot by itself is not a justification for removing valid journalistic references (unless you want to question the RS status of Rappler and Inquirer, which you can do if you wish), so I have restored those references. The Daroy book is accessible in print in well-stocked academic libraries, it is not an "unstable" source. The google books link is just there so any reader can conveniently verify the details of the text. Cheers and Happy New Year. - Batongmalake (talk) 12:29, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)