User talk:Luwanglinux



 past discussion at archive 

Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
Your feedback is requested &#32;at Talk:Israel–Hamas war&#32; on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out! You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 06:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Manipur, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Luwanglinux, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Kautilya3 (talk) 05:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Wow, this is such a strong allegation, I have interest in Manipur and its related article as a native citizen of Manipur, but blaming me for a paid editor is too much, I can proudly say and swear that I have not receive a single cent for my editing so far till now &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)  &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 04:21, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Anglo-Manipur War. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 03:48, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Contentious topics reminder
You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:58, 9 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Kautilya3 I have not deleted the POV of British protectorate, yet you flagged it as WP:UNDUE, Can you explain in detail why you object the expansion in the lead of Manipur (princely state) &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 01:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * MOS:LEAD should summarise the body, and not invent new contentious POVs. And, you need to use your judgement to decide what facts from the body need to be highlighted. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Ok, we need to rework on both lead as well as the body, as the current version of protectorate is also a POV not WP:NPOV &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk)  &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 09:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

June 2024
Hi Luwanglinux! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of 2023–2024 Manipur violence several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 06:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Removal of sourced content from media coverage section as well as removing of (claimed) tag on Meitei Majoritarianism and Anti Christain Sentiment is not explained. &#x1f432; ꯂꯨꯋꯥꯪ  ꯋꯥ ꯍꯥꯏꯐꯝ (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have reverted the new content that you added (or modified), and that is as per the normal WP:BRD process. And, note WP:VNOTSUFF, -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)