User talk:Many baks

Speedy deletion nomination of Galina Lukashenko


A tag has been placed on Galina Lukashenko requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. PoinDexta1 |  Talk to Me  01:06, 4 January 2011 (UTC)  Notice removed, article clearly meets A1. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 01:43, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Galina Lukashenko


The article Galina Lukashenko has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 02:03, 4 January 2011 (UTC) It's all clear--Many baks (talk) 22:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Википедия:Значимость
Правила и руководства о значимости позволяют решить, является ли тема достаточно значимой, чтобы посвятить ей отдельную статью ru:Википедия:Значимость USchick (talk) 17:43, 18 July 2011 (UTC) Здравствуйте, добро пожаловать – в Википедии-английской правила отличаются от русской и украинской. Википедия опирается на опубликованные авторитетные источники, пожалуйста пересмотрите правила Welcome to Wikipedia, ru:Википедия:Проверяемость и ru:Википедия:Удаление страниц. Знание Вашего английского языка User talk:217.118.81.28 воспринимается как деструктивное поведение по ошибке. USchick (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Она значимы. Населеные пункты все значимы. См. ru:Таборы (Украина) uk:Табори--Many baks (talk) 18:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Это был не я--Many baks (talk) 18:46, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Примеры украинских сёл Category:Villages in Khmelnytskyi Oblast, Bakota, Ukraine
 * Все поступки возможно проверить даже видно где Вы находитесь  так что правда и справедливость Вас не подведёт. USchick (talk) 19:00, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Это не я. Я не Волгограде--Many baks (talk) 19:04, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Может не личность, а сервер, но это не ошибка . Я не обвиняю, а просто обьясняю. :-) USchick (talk) 19:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Понял. Тему закроем. По вандалировать захотелось. Руки чешуться --Many baks (talk) 19:12, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * У Вас есть возможность редактировать с помошниками заинтересованными на тему Portal:Ukraine, например User:Vles1 интересуется украинской политикой. Русских друзей можно искать в Portal:Russia. Удачи! :-) USchick (talk) 19:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Спасибо!--Many baks (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Brown (journalist)


The article James Brown (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one.  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  21:36, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU
Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. --k6ka (talk &#124; contribs) 01:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of James Brown (journalist)


The article James Brown (journalist) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Journalist for propaganda outlet. No evidence found in a WP:BEFORE of meeting WP:JOURNALIST, WP:GNG or any other notability standard. No evidence of independent third-party RS coverage of brown, which would be needed for a BLP to exist. Has been tagged for notability for 12 years; no reasonable prospect of organic improvement at this stage. If there are independent RSes about Brown, the article would need them."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2023 (UTC)