User talk:Marctho

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Marctho, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 21:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Online ambassador
Just a quick note to say that I have signed up as online ambassador for your class, and I look forward to helping your students with Wikipedia. Please contact me if I can help in any way. Thanks -- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:27, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Mike - thanks for your help. Most of the students have Wikipedia user IDs and have added a bio to their user page. Can you give us an idea of what your role as online ambassador is? Thanks. Marc Thomas 13:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Mr. Thomas! Just practicing, starting to get the hang of Wikipedia. Neitzs (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

hello teacher
testing the disscussion page

HI
You have to go to the user's page, click the discussion tab, click the new section tab, then write your message -Ian Mckay — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mckay11 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Referendum and Initiative Team Checking In
Hello Professor Thomas, I created my user account for the class project. HurthC1 (talk) 13:20, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello Professor, Caseydud (talk) 13:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Signed into Wikipedia
Richal13 (talk) 13:21, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Testing the Messaging
Thanks Ian for providing the information on how to send a message. Hello, I am just practicing, therefore sending this message. Have a nice day. Brenda Davis --B.Davis21 (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Message
Hello. Slocumm1 (talk) 13:24, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello!
Message from me. Leekse (talk) 13:25, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Prof. Thomas' assignment- checking in.
Hello, I have successfully created a user account as well as signed into the class course page. My group will be covering the Presidency --Rianne Annis Annisr1 (talk) 13:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello Professor
I finally figured this out. Racel1 (talk) 13:38, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

First Assignment- Introduction
How long should our personal introduction paragraph be? --Annisr1 (talk) 13:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

A paragraph would be good. Marc Thomas 13:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Checking in
Proffessor I just checked into the course pageStebba (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)Stebba

logging on
this is josh richter i am now currently logged on wikipedia to begin the project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richterj22 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

HERE I AM
I've logged on and it works. Mckay11 (talk) 13:51, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Reply from Online Ambassador
Marc, you asked me above what an online ambassador can do for you. Essentially I'm a native guide -- I know Wikipedia very well. Ambassadors answer an infinite variety of questions: one student might need me to explain why a blog shouldn't be used as a source for an article; for another I might copyedit a paragraph to show them the difference between an argumentative style and an encyclopedic style; for another I could help with the markup language, to get headings and fonts and image layout to look better; and for another I might work with them to decide on the best structure for the article. About the only thing I'm not going to be able to help with is the actual content of the course itself. I see Wikipedia as an opportunity for the students to learn by having to put the knowledge they gain from the class into a form that is truly useful to the rest of the world: my job is to make that process as simple and painless as I can.

Please let me know (here or on my talk page) if you have any questions that I can help with -- I look forward to working with your class. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 00:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Mike--fancy meeting you here. Marctho, good luck with your assignment. Let me know if I can help. Drmies (talk) 16:45, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Jim Crow laws
Marc

I'm at work so this will be a quick note; I can add more detail later if needed. The Jim Crow laws article is locked because it's been subject to a lot of vandalism; so much so that I don't think we'd be successful if we were to ask for it to be unlocked. The options are:
 * Edit it by requesting a change on the talk page. An administrator will then edit the article, but only if there is consensus from other editors for the change. This could work but would be slow, and I think frustrating, for your students.
 * Work on a version of the article in a sandbox, and then ask for the updates to be made. I wouldn't necessarily recommend this for a new contributor, because there will no doubt be discussion of the changes and it would be timeconsuming to go through all the differences and additions.  However, it might be possible to do this in order to add a new section or paragraph that didn't modify the existing text significantly -- e.g. adding additional historical information independent of the existing material.
 * Ask for the page protection to be reduced to "semi protection". This would allow users with accounts who have made a minimum number of edits to work on the article.  This might work, but there is a risk that if it did not work full protection would be restored, which again would be frustrating for the student.

Working on controversial articles is quite challenging since one has to get consensus from other editors -- this is a useful skill for the student to learn but may not be an efficient use of their time in your class. Is there perhaps a subsidiary article, such as Civil Rights Act of 1875, that your student could work on which would not be subject to those constraints? Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 13:45, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Student page nominated for deletion
Marc, I just noticed that one of your students has had their article nominated for deletion. I posted a note to the student here. I'll help if the student responds but I thought you'd want to know.  I've also left a note for the two campus ambassadors.  I hope the comments I left for the student make sense, but please do ask if anything is unclear or if I can help in any way. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 00:45, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added a couple of sentences to the article in question that may help avoid the article getting deleted. The article is Politics and Pop Culture In the United States‎; the first two sentences (sourced to Edsforth and Bennett) are my addition.  Perhaps a useful distinction is between an outline and a stub: the student created an outline, which is certainly useful in drafting an article, but contains little or no actual content.  On Wikipedia it makes more sense to create a stub -- sometimes only a single sentence, but a sentence which contains sourced content that makes it clear what the topic of the article is and why it's important.  It might be helpful to explain to the students that when they create a new article it must contain more than just their intentions for the article.  If they're not ready to add at least one sentence of content, it's best to keep it in a sandbox a little longer.  I'll keep an eye on the deletion discussion (which is here, if you'd like to take a look) and will comment further there if it seems I can help. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 12:02, 15 October 2011 (UTC)

Mike - thanks for alerting me to this. I need to work with my students to makes sure their articles are better developed before posting. Anna, one our ambassadors, helped out by moving the info to the sandbox. Marc Thomas 23:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note that the page has since been moved in a more Wikipedia-appropriate way to User:Caseydud/Politics and Pop Culture In the United States. The version at User:Caseydud/Sandbox was "cut and pasted" which didn't preserve the edit history. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:33, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Checking in Pols 120
Hi, just making sure this thing is working. --Riverj3 (talk) 00:37, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Ramonts (talk) 21:01, 17 January 2012 (UTC) Hello Mr. Thomas! Turne40 (talk) 00:11, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

Checking in ftw! Maxfielc (talk) 17:21, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi, this is Sam checking in. SamanthaBurl (talk) 19:02, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Jerry D. Roe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milliken (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Grebner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 26th Amendment. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Response: IF Wikipedia does not want links directed to these mysterious "disambiguation" pages, then it should not automatically supply these links when clicking the "Link" button. I changed the link. - Marc Thomas Marc Thomas 16:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 19:04, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)