User talk:Markworthen/Archive 1

Mankind Project
I have reverted some of the edits you made, where you removed material from the Mankind Project article. I have preserved some of the edits which I believe improved the article. It would be good if, rather than blanking the (long-standing, sourced) material again, you would join me at Talk:Mankind Project for discussion. Whistling42 (talk) 10:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I apologize for not discussing my changes first; I should have done that. As you probably can tell, I'm a rookie at editing. After reading your message I realized that I need to study the Wikipedia editing guidelines and policies more thoroughly. I am doing that now.


 * Regarding the ManKind Project, I will respond on the Talk page you specified. All the Best, Markworthen (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

25 March 2009 ManKind Project Edits
I have read everything on the Talk:The_ManKind_Project page; thought very carefully about the edits I made today; and, at the same time, I am very open to feedback or suggestions on the edits I made. Thanks - Markworthen (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Mankind Project
I have reverted some of the edits you made, where you removed material from the Mankind Project article. I have preserved some of the edits which I believe improved the article. It would be good if, rather than blanking the (long-standing, sourced) material again, you would join me at Talk:Mankind Project for discussion. Whistling42 (talk) 10:50, 18 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I apologize for not discussing my changes first; I should have done that. As you probably can tell, I'm a rookie at editing. After reading your message I realized that I need to study the Wikipedia editing guidelines and policies more thoroughly. I am doing that now.


 * Regarding the ManKind Project, I will respond on the Talk page you specified. All the Best, Markworthen (talk) 17:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

25 March 2009 ManKind Project Edits
I have read everything on the Talk:The_ManKind_Project page; thought very carefully about the edits I made today; and, at the same time, I am very open to feedback or suggestions on the edits I made. Thanks - Markworthen (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

The Bisexuality article
I am humbly (or inhumbly, whichever works) requesting for you to return to the Bisexuality article to take another gander. The very first sourced reference is no longer accessible. Perhaps you could provide a secondary reference that backs up the claim. Also check out the discussion page, as to why I think that there might be some better quotations out there sometwhere. I have been unable to find anything, the closest thing I have found is a 1960's book on sexuality in children, that mentions an ineffable sexual curiosity between adolescent males being attracted to both genders, but it hardly qualifies for the lead sentence in the article. Thank you. -- Wolfpeaceful —Preceding undated comment added 20:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC).

The Bisexuality article
I am humbly (or inhumbly, whichever works) requesting for you to return to the Bisexuality article to take another gander. The very first sourced reference is no longer accessible. Perhaps you could provide a secondary reference that backs up the claim. Also check out the discussion page, as to why I think that there might be some better quotations out there sometwhere. I have been unable to find anything, the closest thing I have found is a 1960's book on sexuality in children, that mentions an ineffable sexual curiosity between adolescent males being attracted to both genders, but it hardly qualifies for the lead sentence in the article. Thank you. -- Wolfpeaceful —Preceding undated comment added 20:56, 11 February 2010 (UTC).

Board of Veterans' Appeals
I went ahead and created this, having had a draft in the works for years. Please feel free to expand and improve. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for the heads up. I agree that it deserves an entry. I will take a look at it ASAP. :)  Mark D Worthen PsyD  19:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Board of Veterans' Appeals
I went ahead and created this, having had a draft in the works for years. Please feel free to expand and improve. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:21, 30 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much for the heads up. I agree that it deserves an entry. I will take a look at it ASAP. :)  Mark D Worthen PsyD  19:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicolegal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Medicolegal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Again, please review the Featured article standards and WP:OWN. You are edit warring faulty text into schizophrenia. Please engage the talk page, and familiarize yourself with WP:3RR. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * We were both editing at the same time. I was not trying to engage in an edit war. Another editor asked me to look at this page--I was making a good faith effort to help. I am surprised at your censorious tone.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  02:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, I was surprised that you continued to reinstate text as I was removing it and starting talk page discussions explaining the problems. A (new) editor asked you to help with the DSM5 updates (something I've been begging for for months); you weren't updating to DSM5, you were plopping text in to the lead that is not developed in the body of the article and is not well cited, and other text based on extremely old sources.  When you persisted, it seemed I was going to need to be more forceful to get your attention; I apologize for the "censorious tone", and hope we can keep the article on track.  Updates to Featured articles should be done with consideration for maintaining the highest quality and most recent sources, a high prose standard, adherence to WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, in addition to all of the other requirements of WP:WIAFA, or it will end up defeatured as a result of the update.  I appreciate that this new editor went out and drummed up some people who will finally help (I don't have a copy of DSM5), but as he is new, he isn't likely aware of the FA standards either ... so ... could everyone slow down and review the standards?  If you're not familiar with the citation style used in the article, we can review that on article talk.  Also, if a bit of text needs five sources, it's not likely compliant with MEDRS.  Text in a medical FA should be sourced only to the most recent, highest quality secondary reviews.  Yes, Schizophrenia is outdated and should have been addressed months ago, when DSM5 was published-- but let's proceed in a way that won't end up with the article defeatured.  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello!
Again, please review the Featured article standards and WP:OWN. You are edit warring faulty text into schizophrenia. Please engage the talk page, and familiarize yourself with WP:3RR. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:08, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * We were both editing at the same time. I was not trying to engage in an edit war. Another editor asked me to look at this page--I was making a good faith effort to help. I am surprised at your censorious tone.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  02:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Well, I was surprised that you continued to reinstate text as I was removing it and starting talk page discussions explaining the problems. A (new) editor asked you to help with the DSM5 updates (something I've been begging for for months); you weren't updating to DSM5, you were plopping text in to the lead that is not developed in the body of the article and is not well cited, and other text based on extremely old sources.  When you persisted, it seemed I was going to need to be more forceful to get your attention; I apologize for the "censorious tone", and hope we can keep the article on track.  Updates to Featured articles should be done with consideration for maintaining the highest quality and most recent sources, a high prose standard, adherence to WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS, in addition to all of the other requirements of WP:WIAFA, or it will end up defeatured as a result of the update.  I appreciate that this new editor went out and drummed up some people who will finally help (I don't have a copy of DSM5), but as he is new, he isn't likely aware of the FA standards either ... so ... could everyone slow down and review the standards?  If you're not familiar with the citation style used in the article, we can review that on article talk.  Also, if a bit of text needs five sources, it's not likely compliant with MEDRS.  Text in a medical FA should be sourced only to the most recent, highest quality secondary reviews.  Yes, Schizophrenia is outdated and should have been addressed months ago, when DSM5 was published-- but let's proceed in a way that won't end up with the article defeatured.  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:36, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Schizophrenia
Please review WP:OWN, WP:WIAFA, WP:MEDMOS, WP:CITEVAR and WP:LEAD and familiarize yourself with the article talk page before editing a featured article. You are dropping text from old sources, using a different citation format, into the lead of an article without discussing your edits and without developing text based on the most recent, highest quality reviews in the body of the article first. Please slow down and familiarize yourself with the FA standards before continuing. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * While you were writing this critique, I was taking out the 2004 source (because I too was bothered by its age), and replacing it with a 2013 reference. I stand corrected about the different citation format. I see what you're saying about the proper order, i.e., change body text, then revise intro text. I think the changes I made more accurately reflect current knowledge regarding schizophrenia treatment, but I'll also follow the guidelines you have pointed out to me.


 * If I'm understanding you correctly, our posts crossed in the night as you were changing some of your older citations to a newer one? At any rate, yes, body first, then lead.  Are you familiar with WP:MEDRS and Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches which helps explain how to make sure a PubMed-indexed article is a review?  Also, if you plug a PMID into the Boghog citation filler template, then switch it from cite journal to vcite journal, you'll get a citation template consistent with the article style.  FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it.  If you have DSM5 and are willing to help with the much needed and long overdue update, that would be spectacular, but please be aware that the editor who asked for your help is new and isn't likely familiar with the FA standards (Casliber, who edits that article, is, as are several other medical editors)-- we'd love to have your help, but let's take it slow so we get it right, OK?  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: If I'm understanding you correctly, our posts crossed in the night as you were changing some of your older citations to a newer one?" - Exactly!


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: Are you familiar with ... how to make sure a PubMed-indexed article is a review?"I'm not familiar with the articles--thank you for the heads up. I do know how to differentiate a review from a meta-analysis from an original empirical study, etc.


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it." - Citation style consistency makes good sense. Now I know to always check the citation style so I don't march blithely on thinking everyone uses APA6...


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: we'd love to have your help, but let's take it slow so we get it right, OK?" - Absolutely. I have no problem at all with taking a measured, careful approach. If you knew me, you would know that's my style anyway. In fact, my colleagues accuse me of being "too obsessive-compulsive" or say things like "you always have to have everything like 99.9% correct--relax and make a mistake now and then!" I suspect that asynchronous written communication was the culprit this evening. It's so easy for us to misinterpret what someone has written in an email. It's even worse when two people are simultaneously editing the same document! I can see how my edits came across as haphazard and rushed.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it." - I wasn't going to say anything, but I feel compelled to defend my strict adherence to civility, decency, and proper decorum here. To wit: I never "plop" a citation in an article. Tossing a citation in, or even slapping on a juicy reference, perhaps--although only rarely mind you--but to plop?! No, no, my fair lady, never!  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL-- thanks for the good humor :) :) I was quite worried that the article's featured status was going to be sunk by newbie editors, on top of actually being quite perturbed for months that no one with a copy of DSM5 has done the updates that are now well overdue!  It's a good thing I first expressed my frustration on someone with a good sense of perspective and humor.  Now I shall in good humor change that ugly 3RR heading so it won't go into your archives, and then ... off to bed!  My apologies for jumping on you so, and best regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * No worries at all. I learned a lot in our exchange and I'll be a better editor as a result. Btw, I read your resignation explanation as FA director, which was very informative. I have seen the problem regarding students editing articles willy nilly and was perplexed as to why they seemed to have been recruited by Wikimedia. And I am very impressed with your substantial, high-quality contributions to Wikipedia--and I have only an inkling of your work here. I hope you sleep well. I am headed for slumber myself. :o)  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Awwwww .. I still find it so encouraging when someone I've not met before understands the frustration over student editing, so I'm glad to hear your reaction. Hey, Mark, now that I know you're a nice guy ... who might have a copy of DSM5 ... you'd better watch out, 'cuz boy oh boy have I got work for you!  G'night, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Schizophrenia
Please review WP:OWN, WP:WIAFA, WP:MEDMOS, WP:CITEVAR and WP:LEAD and familiarize yourself with the article talk page before editing a featured article. You are dropping text from old sources, using a different citation format, into the lead of an article without discussing your edits and without developing text based on the most recent, highest quality reviews in the body of the article first. Please slow down and familiarize yourself with the FA standards before continuing. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * While you were writing this critique, I was taking out the 2004 source (because I too was bothered by its age), and replacing it with a 2013 reference. I stand corrected about the different citation format. I see what you're saying about the proper order, i.e., change body text, then revise intro text. I think the changes I made more accurately reflect current knowledge regarding schizophrenia treatment, but I'll also follow the guidelines you have pointed out to me.


 * If I'm understanding you correctly, our posts crossed in the night as you were changing some of your older citations to a newer one? At any rate, yes, body first, then lead.  Are you familiar with WP:MEDRS and Wikipedia Signpost/2008-06-30/Dispatches which helps explain how to make sure a PubMed-indexed article is a review?  Also, if you plug a PMID into the Boghog citation filler template, then switch it from cite journal to vcite journal, you'll get a citation template consistent with the article style.  FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it.  If you have DSM5 and are willing to help with the much needed and long overdue update, that would be spectacular, but please be aware that the editor who asked for your help is new and isn't likely familiar with the FA standards (Casliber, who edits that article, is, as are several other medical editors)-- we'd love to have your help, but let's take it slow so we get it right, OK?  Regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 02:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: If I'm understanding you correctly, our posts crossed in the night as you were changing some of your older citations to a newer one?" - Exactly!


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: Are you familiar with ... how to make sure a PubMed-indexed article is a review?"I'm not familiar with the articles--thank you for the heads up. I do know how to differentiate a review from a meta-analysis from an original empirical study, etc.


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it." - Citation style consistency makes good sense. Now I know to always check the citation style so I don't march blithely on thinking everyone uses APA6...


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: we'd love to have your help, but let's take it slow so we get it right, OK?" - Absolutely. I have no problem at all with taking a measured, careful approach. If you knew me, you would know that's my style anyway. In fact, my colleagues accuse me of being "too obsessive-compulsive" or say things like "you always have to have everything like 99.9% correct--relax and make a mistake now and then!" I suspect that asynchronous written communication was the culprit this evening. It's so easy for us to misinterpret what someone has written in an email. It's even worse when two people are simultaneously editing the same document! I can see how my edits came across as haphazard and rushed.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * "SandyGeorgia wrote: FAs must maintain a consistent citation style, so plopping in a cite pmid won't do it." - I wasn't going to say anything, but I feel compelled to defend my strict adherence to civility, decency, and proper decorum here. To wit: I never "plop" a citation in an article. Tossing a citation in, or even slapping on a juicy reference, perhaps--although only rarely mind you--but to plop?! No, no, my fair lady, never!  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:09, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * LOL-- thanks for the good humor :) :) I was quite worried that the article's featured status was going to be sunk by newbie editors, on top of actually being quite perturbed for months that no one with a copy of DSM5 has done the updates that are now well overdue!  It's a good thing I first expressed my frustration on someone with a good sense of perspective and humor.  Now I shall in good humor change that ugly 3RR heading so it won't go into your archives, and then ... off to bed!  My apologies for jumping on you so, and best regards, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:17, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * No worries at all. I learned a lot in our exchange and I'll be a better editor as a result. Btw, I read your resignation explanation as FA director, which was very informative. I have seen the problem regarding students editing articles willy nilly and was perplexed as to why they seemed to have been recruited by Wikimedia. And I am very impressed with your substantial, high-quality contributions to Wikipedia--and I have only an inkling of your work here. I hope you sleep well. I am headed for slumber myself. :o)  Mark D Worthen PsyD  03:22, 17 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Awwwww .. I still find it so encouraging when someone I've not met before understands the frustration over student editing, so I'm glad to hear your reaction. Hey, Mark, now that I know you're a nice guy ... who might have a copy of DSM5 ... you'd better watch out, 'cuz boy oh boy have I got work for you!  G'night, Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Your helpful DSM-5 edits.
Hello Markworthen; Your name on the DSM-5 edit page indicated you might have the actual manual available. On the Schizophrenia Talk page, there is a list of DSM-5 transition edits identified for upgrade from DMS-4 residual edits still on the old version of the Page being currently displayed. This is one of the few FA psychology pages and can use a little help or comment. Things have been slowed down in making the DSM-5 transition edits there since not all the editors at that wikipage actually have the DSM-5 in hand. Could you glance at this? BillMoyers (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello Markworthen; With appreciation for your edits there after my note. I have posted my direct support for your edits there. Looks like a "go ahead" situation. The sole opposing editor has since admitted on my Talk page to not knowing the difference between a registered nurse in psychiatry and a medical doctor after posting an erroneous 3RR message on my Talk page as that user also put one on your Talk page below. That same user has also posted a boycott on the purchase of a DSM-5 on the Talk:Schiz page which you may want to look at. On the Talk:Schiz page I have also posted a new subsection on "Quality Control" which might be of interest for you to leave a short drop-in comment. BillMoyers (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Your helpful DSM-5 edits.
Hello Markworthen; Your name on the DSM-5 edit page indicated you might have the actual manual available. On the Schizophrenia Talk page, there is a list of DSM-5 transition edits identified for upgrade from DMS-4 residual edits still on the old version of the Page being currently displayed. This is one of the few FA psychology pages and can use a little help or comment. Things have been slowed down in making the DSM-5 transition edits there since not all the editors at that wikipage actually have the DSM-5 in hand. Could you glance at this? BillMoyers (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hello Markworthen; With appreciation for your edits there after my note. I have posted my direct support for your edits there. Looks like a "go ahead" situation. The sole opposing editor has since admitted on my Talk page to not knowing the difference between a registered nurse in psychiatry and a medical doctor after posting an erroneous 3RR message on my Talk page as that user also put one on your Talk page below. That same user has also posted a boycott on the purchase of a DSM-5 on the Talk:Schiz page which you may want to look at. On the Talk:Schiz page I have also posted a new subsection on "Quality Control" which might be of interest for you to leave a short drop-in comment. BillMoyers (talk) 00:09, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
I've commented on your proposed revision at Talk:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Biogeographist (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
I've commented on your proposed revision at Talk:Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Biogeographist (talk) 19:30, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to conduct peer review

 * Peer review/Olfactory reference syndrome/archive1

Hi, Markworthen. My posts on WTMED and WTPSYCH about this peer review have gone unanswered. I see you originally responded to my query regarding section headings in Psych articles.

I am wondering if you would be interested in giving some feedback on olfactory reference syndrome prior to GAN? Failing this, would you be interested in directing me to someone who might be interested in this task? Many thanks, Lesion  ( talk ) 00:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you kindly for having a look at the article. Lesion  ( talk ) 12:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Invitation to conduct peer review

 * Peer review/Olfactory reference syndrome/archive1

Hi, Markworthen. My posts on WTMED and WTPSYCH about this peer review have gone unanswered. I see you originally responded to my query regarding section headings in Psych articles.

I am wondering if you would be interested in giving some feedback on olfactory reference syndrome prior to GAN? Failing this, would you be interested in directing me to someone who might be interested in this task? Many thanks, Lesion  ( talk ) 00:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you kindly for having a look at the article. Lesion  ( talk ) 12:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Markworthen! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on changes to the AfC mailing list
Hello Markworthen! There is a discussion that your input is requested on! I look forward to your comments, thoughts, opinions, criticisms, and questions!

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.
 * This message was composed and sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of &#123;&#123;U&#124;Technical 13&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) 18:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello Markworthen:

WikiProject AFC is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Posted by on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

WikiProject Articles for creation March 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive
 Hello Markworthen:

WikiProject AFC is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

A new version of our AfC helper script has been released! It includes many bug fixes, new improvements and features, code enhancements, and more. If you want to see a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Posted by on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation

Bisexuality
Please avoid marking your change as WP:MINOR when performing significant edits as you did to Bisexuality. "Minor" is usually reserved for edits unlikely to be contested such as typo fixing. I would caution against going to WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION without discussion on talK:Bisexuality. Note that the Pansexuality issue has been discussed at length on talk:Bisexuality. You should address these previous discussions with any arguments for removal of that section from Bisexuality. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Jim1138, I think Markworthen and I have settled this, which is indicated by the discussion he and I had at the Pansexuality article. Flyer22 (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, Flyer22 is correct, and I appreciate the time she took to explain the important background information. But I do appreciate your feedback Jim1138, as what you advise makes sense and will help me become a better editor. -- Mark D Worthen PsyD  10:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Bisexuality
Please avoid marking your change as WP:MINOR when performing significant edits as you did to Bisexuality. "Minor" is usually reserved for edits unlikely to be contested such as typo fixing. I would caution against going to WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION without discussion on talK:Bisexuality. Note that the Pansexuality issue has been discussed at length on talk:Bisexuality. You should address these previous discussions with any arguments for removal of that section from Bisexuality. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 20:30, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Jim1138, I think Markworthen and I have settled this, which is indicated by the discussion he and I had at the Pansexuality article. Flyer22 (talk) 21:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes, Flyer22 is correct, and I appreciate the time she took to explain the important background information. But I do appreciate your feedback Jim1138, as what you advise makes sense and will help me become a better editor. -- Mark D Worthen PsyD  10:07, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  17:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Psychological Injury and Law (Journal) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  Mark D Worthen PsyD  17:16, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!
It has been a great week - first I qualified as a Novice Editor, and now you have given me my first Barnstar! I am still bumbling about trying to learn and improve, and your encouragement really does make a difference. As we say here in Oz, your blood is worth bottling!

Time to celebrate...



--Gronk Oz (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You are most welcome. And believe me, I can definitely relate to 'bumbling'! I have received many a 'lesson' just in the last 24 hours as I commit one newbie error after another, chanting "humility is a virtue, humility is a virtue" to myself all the while. Btw, I love that saying, "your blood is worth bottling!" I shall use it soon amongst some friends, and when they look puzzled, I will return their gaze with a condescending "What? You've never heard that well-known Aussie expression?" look. ;^] -  Mark D Worthen PsyD  14:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!
It has been a great week - first I qualified as a Novice Editor, and now you have given me my first Barnstar! I am still bumbling about trying to learn and improve, and your encouragement really does make a difference. As we say here in Oz, your blood is worth bottling!

Time to celebrate...



--Gronk Oz (talk) 14:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You are most welcome. And believe me, I can definitely relate to 'bumbling'! I have received many a 'lesson' just in the last 24 hours as I commit one newbie error after another, chanting "humility is a virtue, humility is a virtue" to myself all the while. Btw, I love that saying, "your blood is worth bottling!" I shall use it soon amongst some friends, and when they look puzzled, I will return their gaze with a condescending "What? You've never heard that well-known Aussie expression?" look. ;^] -  Mark D Worthen PsyD  14:57, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Welcome
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Welcome
 Hello and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (send... over) 02:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
 Hello Markworthen:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) (c) by &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification of a June AfC BackLog Drive
 Hello Markworthen:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a  month long Backlog Elimination Drive!

The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from June 1, 2014 to June 30, 2014.

Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!

The AfC helper script can assist you in tallying your edits automatically. To view a full list of changes, visit the changelog. Please report bugs and feature requests there, too! Thanks. Sent on behalf of (t) (c) by &#123;&#123;U&#124;&#125;&#125; (t • e • c) using the MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:45, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621308385 your edit] to Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=621308385 your edit] to Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:28, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:06, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the Military history Wikiproject's Historian and Newcomer of the Year Awards are now open!
The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Voting for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year now open!
Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators,

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Military history coordinator election
Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 29 September. Yours, Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 05:20, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States
The article Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States
The article Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Veterans benefits for post-traumatic stress disorder in the United States for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:10, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 1
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 1
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 2
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 3
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Round 3
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup-Round 3 Clarification
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup-Round 3 Clarification
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Finals
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Finals
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

2016 GA Cup-Wrap Up
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Certified Acceptance Corporation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NGC and PCGS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Certified Acceptance Corporation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NGC and PCGS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * My first Barnstar! Woo hoo! :O)

A barnstar for you!

 * My first Barnstar! Woo hoo! :O)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
Greetings from the Military history WikiProject! Elections for the Military history WikiProject Coordinators are currently underway, and as a member of the WikiProject you are cordially invited to take part by casting your vote(s) for the candidates on the election page. This year's election will conclude at 23:59 UTC 23 September. For the Coordinators, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:01, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup Announcement
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

GA Cup Announcement
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:38, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I think you've earned this Barnstar!

 * Thank you so much! That means a ton to me. :0)  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)  16:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that, and thanks again to you. Tlhslobus (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

I think you've earned this Barnstar!

 * Thank you so much! That means a ton to me. :0)  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)  16:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Glad to hear that, and thanks again to you. Tlhslobus (talk) 14:12, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow! Thank you so much Chrissymad! - that means a lot to me. :O)  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)  17:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow! Thank you so much Chrissymad! - that means a lot to me. :O)  - Mark D Worthen PsyD   (talk)  17:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 19:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

We're on Twitter!
RachelWex 19:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Books and Bytes - Issue 22
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 22, April-May 2017

 Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * New and expanded research accounts
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
 * Bytes in brief

Books and Bytes - Issue 22
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 22, April-May 2017

 Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * New and expanded research accounts
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: OCLC Partnership
 * Bytes in brief

Your submission at Articles for creation: Actual silver weight has been accepted
 Actual silver weight, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! - Mark D Worthen PsyD  (talk)  07:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Actual silver weight has been accepted
 Actual silver weight, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! - Mark D Worthen PsyD  (talk)  07:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Books and Bytes - Issue 23
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 23, June-July 2017

<div style = "margin-top: 1.5em; border: 3px solid #ae8c55; border-radius: .5em; padding: 1em 1.5em; font-size: .9em"> Chinese, Arabic and Yoruba versions of Books & Bytes are now available in meta! Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Library card
 * User Group update
 * Global branches update
 * Spotlight: Combating misinformation, fake news, and censorship
 * Bytes in brief