User talk:Michael Slone

I joined WP:WPM too
Except, I apparently had grassmania and thought you were stoned, that is Michael Stone interested in group theory, algebra, and representation theory on WikiProject_Mathematics/Participants. Do you have any pros/cons about joining? Too late for me now of course, but I'm curious. I was thinking your refs tasks might be a good task for the project too. JackSchmidt (talk) 03:10, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the delay in my response. I don't have any particular objections to joining and suspect I may do so Real Soon Now.  However, I would rather avoid the stress of trying to export the refs tasks. Michael Slone (talk) 03:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Abstract Polytopes
I am new to editing Wikipedia. I have been working on creating an axiomatic abstract polytope definition for 40 years, mostly alone. I have not found it easy to find relevant material or sources. I do however have quite an impressive amount of material that I think will advance the subject - but need help with proving its worth by means of references. Maybe you can help...?

First, I'd be most interested in your reaction to my recent addition to the discussion page.

Steve  SLWoolf (talk) 13:59, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Determinants: repair of History section
Dear Mr. Slone:

I apologize for having accidentally deleted some of the material on Wikipedia's "Determinants" page. I believe that the deleted material has been restored. Sorry about the inconvenience.

Best regards,

Christopher Kirk, Shrewsbury, Mass., USA —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cwkmail (talk • contribs) 02:11, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

permutation groups
In that the text is clearly in error, I think my idea was better of posting a counter example in the text. The text should either be deleted or corrected.01001 (talk) 23:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: stub sorting
Thanks for pointing that out. I was in a rush so I didn't have time to go through all the different stub types to find the one that worked, plus football's not my forte. Wizardman 18:23, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

St Joesphs primary school bracknell
Many thanks. Now shifted, and I'll sort out the redirect some other time. In case you're wondering why I'm bothering with this arguably non notable article, it's because it is the only vaguely constructive contribution from a vandal who I am trying to encourage into better ways. Grblundell (talk) 09:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Samantha555 and the deletion process
Thanks. I tried to explain the deletion process to her, but I don't think she's catching on. This apparently the first time she's had something deleted, and she's become a bit emotional about it. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 02:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

On the catwatch

 * In [ reply] to [ your message]:

Fixed. The API had changed a few months back. JackSchmidt (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

BIRTH-DEATH-SORT vs Lifetime
Hi. Considering this edit of yours and many others, I would like to make 3 comments: 1. BIRTH-DEATH-SORT is a redirect, the vast majority of users uses Lifetime. 2. If YOB and YOD (or Living people) categories are present, please just add DEFAULTSORT, otherwise we have duplicated categories, 3. Please don't replace DEFAULTSORT+the 2 categories with Lifetime. This is not considered as constructive editing. Thanks and keep editing, Magioladitis (talk) 23:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)


 * I disagree that it is not constructive to use the Lifetime template. In any case, as you can see from this edit and others, the edit of mine you listed on Template talk:Lifetime as an example of my work is not representative of my contributions.  If you have concerns about my editing habits, I would appreciate it if you would discuss them directly with me on my talk page before using them as a source of examples for your arguments on template talk pages. Michael Slone (talk) 01:39, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

My point is that Lifetime cause problems because many users are not familiar with it and they keep adding YOB/D categories even if Lifetime is present, many bots need the categories to be written in order to function correctly, etc. Apart from that, since Lifetime does exactly the same work with YOB|YOD|DEFAULSORT, replacing them in order to add Lifetime this is not constructive. It's like removing whitespace from article or just moving stub tags around. Moreover, there is no consensus, yet, pro or against lifetime. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Michael Rudd
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Michael Rudd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 04:26, 21 October 2008 (UTC)

Lang Algebra reference
Hi. I noticed that you have a user subpage that you keep references on (User:Michael_Slone/refs). On there, you list a 4th edition of Lang's algebra, which as far as I can tell, does not exist. Is this an error? I am particularly interested because I have created a template (Template:Lang Algebra) that allows one to reference any edition of his book very simply, for example, produces

and I would like to know if there is indeed another edition to add. According to this page on Springer's site, it looks like you might be referring to the "Corrected 4th printing of the 3rd revised edition". Thanks. RobHar (talk) 20:08, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing this out. I agree, I've never heard of a 4th edition of Lang's Algebra, and am not sure why I put that on my refs page.  I've replaced my ref with the template. Michael Slone (talk) 21:58, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Commutativity
Thanks for the clarification here. It makes much more sense now. Cheers! --Thomprod (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Message regarding your use of the No Multi License Template
In case you are not aware, the Wikimedia Foundation has proposed that the copyright licensing terms on the wikis operated by the WMF – including Wikipedia – be changed to include the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA) license in addition to the current GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) as allowed by version 1.3 of the GFDL. The community has approved this change with 75.8% in favor, and on June 15, 2009, the change will take effect. You currently have NoMultiLicense on your user or user talk page, which states that your edits are licensed under the GFDL only. On or before June 15, this template will be changed to reflect Wikipedia's new licensing terms. If you accept the licensing change, you do not need to do anything (and feel free to remove this message); if you do not accept it, we regret that you will no longer be able to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please join the discussion at Village pump (policy) if you have any comments.

Delivered by The  Helpful  Bot  at 20:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC) for the Village pump. Report errors here.

Henry Aurand
You guessed correctly. General Aurand transferred to the Ordnance Corps. I have corrected the error in the article.

Thank you. Tm3108 (talk) 00:49, 20 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tm3108 (talk • contribs) 00:46, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Simultaneous resolution.png


The file File:Simultaneous resolution.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 24 December 2019 (UTC)