User talk:Mike40033

Hi there. Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop us a note at New user log to introduce yourself.

If you need editing help, visit How does one edit a page. For format questions, visit our manual of style. You can use the Show preview button before you save, to make sure your edits do what you intended.

You can sign your name on talk pages by using " " for your username and " ~ " for your username and a timestamp.

Some time when you're bored, you can read through our policies and guidelines. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username.

If you have any other questions about the project then check out Help or add a question to the Village pump. You can also drop me a question on my talk page.

Happy editing, Isomorphic 07:39, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)


 * Hi again. Thanks for your note on the new user log.  If you're interested in contributing some of your mathematical knowledge, you might be interested in the utilities at WikiProject Mathematics.  Good luck.  Isomorphic 05:36, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Hi Mike, nice to see another bird article contributor, especially from a prt of the world which is poorly covered at present. Now all we need is a South American!

jimfbleak

The Humungous Image Tagging Project
Hi. You've helped with the WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for at at and the the, non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --Tagishsimon (talk)

Untagged images
Hi. You uploaded Image:Circogoniaicosahedra ekw.jpg but did not list any copyright information on the image description page. Please mark it either as GFDL or public domain. See Image_copyright_tags for more info. Please note that images without copyright information may be deleted in the future. Thanks. RedWolf 19:00, Dec 23, 2004 (UTC)

untaggedimages-bl
Sweet job on adding sections to that page. Good move! --MaxPower 14:37, 2005 Jan 11 (UTC)

1 E60 m³
Hi there. Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article 1 E60 m³, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the relevant issues at Talk:1 E60 m³. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 22:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)

Regular polytope FAR
Regular polytope has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. Sandy (Talk) 23:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

abstract polytope references
Sure, go ahead and add the references to it and make a note on my talk page, then I'll go 'wikify' them for you. Just add them in whatever format you want or happen to be familiar with. Felisse (talk) 21:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Abstract polytopes
You have previously contributed to the Abstract polytope article. If you feel able, please contribute to the discussion on Notation, where I am hoping to resolve a long-standing dispute. Many thanks in anticipation. &mdash; Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 14:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

The bogus term "polychoron"
Well, no, Mike, Wikipedia's technical articles indeed aspire to stick to standard terminology, and Wikipedia is the wrong place for someone's indiosyncratic coinage to be promoted. I have math credentials that qualify me to judge. If you cited a valid usage of this bogus term then

a) It must be very recent, because only a couple of months ago MathSciNet, which indexes keywords in all respected journals, had zero occurences of this coinage.

and

b) It is more than likely that the bogus occurrence of this bogus term in Wikipedia was what led naive young mathematicians to use it.

IF the term has any validity then let it catch on among mathematicians first. Since that is extremely far from what has happened to date, I suggest you stick to terms that are actually used by experts in a field.

Wikipedia has a big responsibility that you seem to be oblivious to, and that is to not make stuff up.Daqu (talk) 05:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)