User talk:Mikeymikemikey

Discretionary sanctions alert
NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 06:59, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

I think it is now time to ask you to read wp:dropthestick and wp:tenditious.08:41, 4 May 2021 (UTC)


 * NorthBySouthBaranof Are you a politician? You are quoting this nonsense as a way to disparage a new editors reputation. It's pretty easy to do, here I think this are relevant for you: stonewalling WP:STONEWALL, wikilawyering: WP:LAWYER, being a d**k to new editors with this wiklawyering: WP:WP DNB
 * Also read: WP:INTREF4
 * "Sources that are reliable for some material are not reliable for other material."
 * And read: WP:WELLKNOWN
 * Example: "John Doe had a messy divorce from Jane Doe." Is the divorce important to the article, and was it published by third-party reliable sources? If not, leave it out. If so, avoid use of "messy" and stick to the facts: "John Doe and Jane Doe divorced."
 * please note it says "and" not "or", so like you avoid using messy, avoid using "far-right" as none of the articles were about Project Veritas' "far-right" views.
 * Will you concede I have a point, or will you do some more wikilawyering? Or just ignore me because you know the cabal of veteran editors who have your back? I feel I have not been uncourteous, yet I'm met with rash wiki-bureaucratic filibustering. My point is well in the guidelines and has not be addressed, so I'm not tendentiously holding a stick.Mikeymikemikey (talk) 12:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

I suggest you read wp:tenditious and wp:dropthestick. wp:badgering a forum will not convince anyone.Slatersteven (talk) 09:42, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Slatersteven WP:STONEWALL WP:LAWYERMikeymikemikey (talk) 10:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Slatersteven (talk) 10:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)