User talk:Mindstalk

Dummy text to get started. Mindstalk 21:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey there: As of 2008 was linked in accordance with As_of. Pfhorrest (talk) 10:01, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

warning vandals
Hello Mindstalk.

I noticed that you revert a lot of vandalism. Thank you for helping keep Wikipedia the best encyclopedia in the world!

However, I have noticed that you do not always leave warnings on the vandals talk pages. You should always leave an appropriate warning after reverting vandalism. (The full list of talk page warnings may be found here, along with some suggestions and guidelines for using them.)

Be sure to leave the correct level of warning, and if the vandal has been warned four times in the last month, (Check the vandal's talk page history. Some vandals remove warnings from their talk pages.) report the vandal by going to this page and following the instructions.

Thank you again, and may the vandals fail... J.d ela noy gabs adds 19:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't see that you had warned them. However, you should use the warnings on WP:UTM so that bots and people using automatic tools to fight vandalism will leave the correct level warning. Cheers! J.d ela noy gabs adds  19:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Absurd sentence on the peaceful liberation of Tibet
I agree that it is absurd to include the phrase "peaceful liberation" in a sentence that ends with the PRC shelling 30,000 civilians. I'm sure the irony is not lost on readers. I think we should just let the facts speak for themselves. Longchenpa (talk) 23:38, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

No original research
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 01:03, 23 April 2008 (UTC)


 * At one time, each of the articles for every major Avatar character had huge relationship sections. But these were removed because it is "in-universe" information that is not important in understanding the overall plot. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 02:49, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

James Nicoll
Your revision to this article is being reverted by a number of editors because it is a non-notable source and the link's insertion can be seen more as an advertisement for the obscure Orion's Arm than as an improvement of the article. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  22:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)