User talk:Minecraft69

What are you doing to the SU episode page!?! Each season only has 26 episodes... The shorts count as one is production stand of view. Bismuth is 20 not 2 episodes in one.. The kindergarten kid and know your fusion are part of season 3. CN made a mistake earthlings is the truthful 100 episode. I had everything right now revert it. Sorry for being rude but your ruining the Paige.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Changeisgame (talk • contribs) 19:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of Steven Universe episodes has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of Steven Universe episodes was changed by Minecraft69 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975268 on 2015-09-28T16:44:57+00:00.
 * This was a false positive by ClueBot. However, please do not copy-paste episode summaries. That is a copyright violation. Thank you.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 16:54, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ocean Gem


The article Ocean Gem has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NTV - Non notable standalone article about an episode

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --allthefoxes (Talk) 19:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ToonZone forums is not a reliable source  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 17:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Thank you for your contributions&#32;to List of Steven Universe episodes, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. nyuszika7h (talk) 18:58, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of Steven Universe episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ''The dozen or so episodes you added were not mentioned in the source you provided. ''  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) Please &#123;&#123;re&#125;&#125; 21:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bismuth (Steven Universe)


The article Bismuth (Steven Universe) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced. Needs reliable sources to establish notability (WP:N). Please do not create articles that do not meet minimal mainspace standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Sandstein  15:58, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at List of Steven Universe episodes. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. (Diff) – nyuszika7h (talk) 16:57, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Rose's Scabbard (Steven Universe)
I'd suggest creating articles in draft space or userspace where you don't risk deletion, because the article you just created is completely unreferenced so far. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~ Rob 13 Talk 01:40, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Alex&#124;The&#124;Whovian ? 13:15, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

List of Steven Universe episodes
Any kind of edit warring from you when protection expires will result in a lengthy block. --Neil N  talk to me 03:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bismuth (Steven Universe) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bismuth (Steven Universe) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bismuth (Steven Universe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of It's Over, Isn't It?
[[

Image:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

A tag has been placed on It's Over, Isn't It? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds  00:14, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Also
I feel I should tell you that your userpage was vandalized and stayed vandalized for over two months. During this time, it read that "Jail Break" was your least favourite episode, and "Say Uncle" your favourite. I have undone the vandalism. --Yellow Diamond Δ Direct Line to the Diamonds  00:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Platinum (II) bromide
I reverted your edit of PtBr2, as CRC indicates that it is insoluble. This is the current CRC, plus a 30 year old one.JSR (talk) 16:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Okay, I only changed it because it had no source labelled. Minecraft69 (talk) 16:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * A lot of the properties have little or no documentation.JSR (talk) 16:50, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I must ask, you reverted my edit within 2 minutes of me making it.. do you hang around those really obscure pages and constantly refresh them? (I thought I was the only one haha). Minecraft69 (talk) 16:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You don't have notification of changes to your watchlist?JSR (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Nope. I don't use this account much. Minecraft69 (talk) 16:55, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Rose's Scabbard for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rose's Scabbard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rose's Scabbard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Quasar  G.  12:33, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sworn to the Sword for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sworn to the Sword is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sworn to the Sword until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —  Quasar  G.  12:42, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

List of Steven Universe episodes Season episode counts
I notice you have once again reverted the change made to List of Steven Universe episodes regarding the placement of Log Date 7 15 2. As mentioned when you previously reverted this change, I would appreciate if you could discuss on the talk page of the article about this change and we could reach some consensus. For reference, there have already been two discussions on this topic (here and here) with no replies but both coming to the consensus that Log Date 7 15 2 should be included in season 3. Either way, there's no definite answer on this, but so far the only evidence on the talk page suggests that it should be included in season 3. Cloud789 (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

There is no official word on where Log Date stands, but for over a year and a half now, it's been accepted as the final episode of season 2, since it makes much more sense that "Super Watermelon Island" be the opener for season 3, and the long break between Log Date 7 15 2 and Super Watermelon Island was seen as a seasonal break (though they were called seasons 2A and 2B at the time, so more of a mid-season break). It also makes a lot of sense as the finale of season 2, since it's sort of a wrap-up episode. Also I was like 13 when I made this account so don't judge me based on my username. Minecraft69 (talk) 13:46, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

List of Steven Universe episodes
Your recent bold edit has been reverted. Per the bold, revert, discuss cycle, after a bold edit is reverted, the status quo should remain while a discussion is started instead of edit-warring, and it should be resolved before reinstating the edit, after a needed consensus is formed to keep it. -- / Alex /21  13:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Everyone Knows That (Ulterior Motives)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:25, 28 April 2024 (UTC)