User talk:Minskist popper/Archive5

From May 30 to August 9:

Thanks!
Thanks for letting me know. I made a mistake, obviously, and I appreciate your correction. Thanks again! hmwith talk   05:13, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Where the top is
It's at the other end. &#9786; Uncle G 03:28, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * edits

E-mail!
I've re-sent you the email, dear Wooyi - let me know if you got it this time, k, please? Hope you're doing fine! :) Love,  P h a e d r i e l  - 22:25, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:George McGovern bioguide.jpg speedy deletion notice
FYI, images that are duplicates on the Wikimedia Commons should be marked with the template instead of speedy. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 19:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Got it!
Got your mail, dear Wooyi! :) I'm kinda short of time right now, but you'll get a reply, I swear! have a beautiful weekend!  P h a e d r i e l  - 21:58, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Release Version
I copy and paste the template for a passed article for Release Version 7, and the last I recall we were holding off on assigning an "importance" to an article - since that is an extremely debatable parameter to assign a value to - so I leave the parameter in the same form it is here. I hope that clears it up any. --Ozgod 02:18, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Recreations
Please stop recreating validly deleted pages simply because you disagree with the deletion. If you would like to contest a deletion, please take it to WP:DRV. Indeed, they are already listed there, and you have already commented there, so this seems particularly inappropriate. Dmcdevit·t 20:12, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
 * At this point, I would have to agree. (Though "validly" is currently in dispute.) As an aside, I honestly would have liked to have seen (and possibly still see) the matter resolved at Dmcdevit's talk page. - jc37 21:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XIII - June 2007
The June 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot -- 15:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Cohen v. California
Cohen v. California it looks like your automated bot marked an edit as vandalism. its wrong.

Tagging commons images
Hi, please don't take this the wrong way, but could I ask you to use some discretion in which images you tag to be transfered to commons? I might specifically look at Image:DSCN6573 a 1.JPG, which you tagged, and seems to have little value. Hope not to sound rude. Thanks. The Evil Spartan 20:45, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Edit to Happy Chandler
I noticed you have re-added information regarding Happy Chandler's relation to Ben Chandler to his article. I agree that this is important information, and I only removed it because a good article reviewer complained that it was a one-sentence paragraph and needed to be expanded for the article to pass GA. Any ideas on how to expand it to two or more sentences to head off this complaint and insulate the article from de-listing? Acdixon 20:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Perfect expansion. Thanks a lot! Acdixon 02:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Unjust?
The block on Nationalist was not 'unjust', edit warring, incivility, personal attacks and vandalism, please explain as how this is unjust, because I cannot see. Meateater 10:00, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

My RFA
Hi Wooyi, just a quick note to say thanks for participating in my request for adminship. It was successful and I now have some shiny new buttons. If I can ever be of help, please let me know. Happy editing, mattbr 10:16, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Requests for arbitration/PalestineRemembered
Because the dispute being arbitrated has resolved and any restrictions on the involved editors have been lifted, this arbitration case has been closed with no further action being taken. This notice is given by a clerk on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. Newyorkbrad 15:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Unblocked! :)
Hello! Durova has unblocked me after a friendly email correspondence. Anyway, thanks again for your concern and kindness. I have added you to the list of favorite Wikipedians on my user page! Sincerely, --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles 17:11, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:0786016957.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:0786016957.01._SS500_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Qst 16:20, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Herbert-Mullin.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Herbert-Mullin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:30, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Herbert-Mullin.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Herbert-Mullin.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which lawenforcment agency took the picture? ShakespeareFan00 21:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cr1gwenwoods.jpg
I have tagged Image:Cr1gwenwoods.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:47, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Cr1gwenwoods.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Cr1gwenwoods.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law enforcement agency took the photo? ShakespeareFan00 21:49, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Waynegacy.jpg
I have tagged Image:Waynegacy.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 21:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Waynegacy.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Waynegacy.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary.,In particular which law enforcment agency took the photo originally? ShakespeareFan00 22:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Similaun0807
See WP:AN. This is not a legitimate user or userpage. THF 23:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ted-bundy.jpg
I have tagged Image:Ted-bundy.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ted-bundy.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Ted-bundy.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law enforcment agency took the photo originally? ShakespeareFan00 11:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:9-1-Marybeth-Tinning.jpg
I have tagged Image:9-1-Marybeth-Tinning.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:36, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:9-1-Marybeth-Tinning.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:9-1-Marybeth-Tinning.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law enforcment agency took the photo originally? ShakespeareFan00 11:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nico-Claux-Mugshot.jpg
I have tagged Image:Nico-Claux-Mugshot.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:10, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nico-Claux-Mugshot.jpg
Hi, Thank you for uploading Image:Nico-Claux-Mugshot.jpg,however it would be much appreciated if you could expand or clarify the sourcing information you have provided in the image summary., In particular which law enforcment agency took the picture? ShakespeareFan00 12:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Miranda_photo.jpg
I have tagged Image:Miranda_photo.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Jerome-H-Brudos150.jpg
I have tagged Image:Jerome-H-Brudos150.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XIV - July 2007
The July 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 17:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:RJGalindo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RJGalindo.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Remember the dot (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XV - August 2007
The August 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 14:33, 9 August 2007 (UTC)