User talk:MisterCSharp

Feel free to leave a message here. I will respond to it on this page.MisterCSharp (talk) 18:30, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Sergei Rachmaninoff
Hi,

when nullifying my edit to the Rachmaninoff article, I think you have misunderstood the Russian spelling. It is inconsistent and looks very strange to spell his last name Рахма́ниновъ with an ending ъ (the pre 1918 spelling), when his first name and patronymic Серге́й Васи́льевич are spelled according to post 1918 rules. You can't mix and match between the two spelling conventions. If you want to use the information to, for instance, look up Rachmaninoff in a Russian dictionary you would certainly use the modern spelling.

Cheers


 * That's very interesting. Please take this information to the article's talk page so it can be discussed before changing.MisterCSharp (talk) 12:34, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Glenn Gould
Argolin (talk) 05:16, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Artur Rubinstein
Hi, Thanks for removing the tag from Artur Rubinstein. I completely overlooked the ref and didn't see the reference about his Chopin playing. Sorry! Rain City 471 talk 16:48, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Happy to help, although I don't necessarily agree with the reference!MisterCSharp (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Vladimir Horowitz
Hello, Mr. CSharp,

With all due respect, what's the point of avoiding the use of infoboxes on Classical musicians' pages? And what 'consensus' has there been regarding this? I am not aware of any, although I'm aware this has been discussed numerous times...but I do not know that the general consensus would be to *not* add info boxes.

I have also encountered several classical musician pages where infoboxes are used...for instance this one.

I don't intend to be rude or challenging, but in my opinion there is nothing detrimental about adding info boxes to classical musician pages. Why should this differ from its use on non-classical pages?

-LoniousSphere (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Please see, WikiProject Classical music. Also, please remember to sign your posts with four tildes.MisterCSharp (talk) 13:48, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

The article states, "Infoboxes are neither required nor prohibited for any article.". Technically, no one is obliged to put, or not to put, infoboxes on Classical musician articles.

However, it also states, "Whether to include an infobox, which infobox to include, and which parts of the infobox to use, is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." Does this mean I am not allowed to put infoboxes on articles unless other editors deem it necessary?

If I had placed an info box without the consent of majority of the editors in that article, what gives you more right to make sure that there is no info box on that same article?

-LoniousSphere (talk) 14:35, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Established procedure is to go to the article's Talk page, look for existing discussions on the topic, and see if there is a consensus. If none exists, you can start a discussion thread.  Generally when there has been discussion of whether to add an infobox to Classical musician bios, the consensus has been to not add them. MisterCSharp (talk) 14:41, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Valentina Lisitsa
Hello MisterCSharp,

Re: Valentina Lisitsa

Please insert a link to the source, where citation needed about threats: https://www.facebook.com/ValentinaLisitsa/posts/623465447754643:0

Please insert the following articles on the subject of controversy:

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/peace-and-prosperity/2015/april/06/toronto-symphony-orchestra-goes-full-stalin/#.VSNR3bFcEk4.twitter

http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2015/04/07/big-brother-takes-toronto-symphony-orchestra/

This is about the tweet that was referred https://twitter.com/ValLisitsa/status/585297099241234432

Same to embed:

 Euromaidanites actually quote Charlie Hebdo tweet -without showing it :) @gbazov <a Truthwarrior55 (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Welcome to Wikipedia, Truthwarrior55. I find it interesting that your first edit under this username is to request me to add links to sources.  Point 1. If you want to insert a link as a reference, do it yourself.  Point 2. Political instituts and blogs are not considered valid sources.  Request denied.MisterCSharp (talk) 11:23, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Emanuel Ax
Hi, MisterCSharp. Re: this edit you said “Nationality is based on when subject became notable.” I wonder could you direct me to the relevant part of MoS? (I have no ax to grid here!) Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:50, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Sure thing. Here you go:    MisterCSharp (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I thought it might be relevant to the rather long and tiresome discussion at Talk:Arvo Pärt. But I'm pretty sure he was notable before he took Austrian citizenship. Martinevans123 (talk) 16:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)