User talk:MrHistorianDude

Proposed deletion of St Clemens Basilica
Hello, MrHistorianDude. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, St Clemens Basilica, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ghostboy1997 (talk) 23:05, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve St Mary's Cathedral, Fürstenwalde
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. MrHistorianDude, thanks for creating St Mary's Cathedral, Fürstenwalde!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 08:02, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of New St. John's Church, Munich


A tag has been placed on New St. John's Church, Munich, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dark Sun (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholic Diocese of Gurk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carinthia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of Holmen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ballintoy Parish Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diocese of Connor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (St. Gallen Cathedral) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating St. Gallen Cathedral, MrHistorianDude!

Wikipedia editor Justlettersandnumbers just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"If – as it appears – this was translated from the de.wp article, it requires a translated page tag on the talk-page for attribution. There's plenty more to say about this famous church; some sources might help with that!"

To reply, leave a comment on Justlettersandnumbers's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John's Lane Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D-flat ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/John%27s_Lane_Church check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/John%27s_Lane_Church?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Worms Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Worms ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Worms_Cathedral check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Worms_Cathedral?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Ballintoy Parish Church for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ballintoy Parish Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ballintoy Parish Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Barkeep Chat 18:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello sir, I’m Sean McGrade from Omagh.I live in Florida now. I’ve got some interesting items I’ve owned for 25 years that belonged to Batista. My email is seandubliner@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:581:C101:77D0:104E:8B48:7746:866F (talk) 14:43, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Martinskirche
Don't you think that it would be polite to discuss a move that was reverted? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Please take a look at de:Martinskirche: Some are called St. Martin, mostly Catholic, some are called Martinskirche (mostly Protestant). I'd prefer to keep the distinction by not translating. Do you have a reliable source for the present English name? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:22, 7 February 2020 (UTC)

Film plot size limit
At The Living Daylights, I removed your addition while rolling back the plot section. The size of the plot section is limited to 700 words per WP:FILMPLOT. If you would like to add a plot detail, you should check the plot size; I use one of many free online word count tools. Once the plot is approaching 700 words, the desired new details will be replacing old ones that get removed to make room, so it becomes an exercise in word frugality. The guideline values concision over completeness – an exhaustive or fully complete plot description is not intended. Thanks for your vigilance. Binksternet (talk) 05:45, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)