User talk:MrLinkinPark333

Welcome to the drive!
Welcome to the drive! Since you are an experienced WikiGnome, I guess you should take a look at the tips and tricks section on how to navigate through mess that is called Category:Articles lacking sources. Otherwise, good luck, and prepare yourself. The next month will be very exciting! CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 17:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome MrLinkinPark333! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles. CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:39, 2 February 2024 UTC //en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MrLinkinPark333&action=purge refresh via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name
Hi MrLinkinPark333 – have you considered running for adminship? I've seen you around many times and always had quite a positive impression of you; you've done good work with content, you seem to have an even keel, and the copyright team could always benefit from more admin hands. Dylan 620 (he/him • talk • edits) 23:59, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there! You're not the only one who've recommended me to run for adminship.I'm not interested in becoming an admin. Thank you for this honor!  :) MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 00:10, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * But @MrLinkinPark333, @Dylan620 is saying the truth. However, if you choose so, let it be. Happy editing. Regards, Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 22:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Article for Sam Feldman
Hi MrLinkinPark333, I work for Canadian music executive Sam Feldman, and I'm trying to create a Wikipedia article for him. I see that you have an interest in articles related to Canada, and that you've updated the Walt Grealis Special Achievement Award list, which Sam Feldman received, in the past. I'm hoping that you will take a look at the draft I have posted here. Would you consider moving it to main space?

Thank you, Sarah for SF (talk) 17:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello there. Per Conflict of interest, this draft requires Template:Connected contributor (paid) to be filled out at User talk:Sarah for SF/Sam Feldman draft. Secondly, this draft would need to be submitted at Articles for creation. A reviewer there can give advice for what this draft requires. Taking a quick look, I notice that the references require cleanup. The main issues I see there are duplicate citations and too many quotations. I suggest taking a look at Citing sources and Quotations on ways to fix there issues. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:23, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 19:24, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, I think the number of quotes could be trimmed down per Offline sources. For example, I don't think a quote would be needed to show Feldman was born in 1949. Reference quotes would be useful for information that could be challenged, like which bands A&F Music worked with in the early 1970s. Also, the length of the quotes could be trimmed down as well. Reference quotes can help with verification, but many long quotes can be too much per Quotations. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your feedback, MrLinkinPark333. I have added a paid editor tag to the draft talk page in addition to the disclosure that was already on my user page. As for the quotes in my citations - I have source material from reliable publications that are not available online, and included the relevant quotes in the references so that those without access to hardcopies can verify. I looked into Citing sources, and I understand that this is an appropriate method for this situation- do you know if there is an even better way to address this? Thank you for your guidance, I really appreciate it. Sarah for SF (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello. I previously replied to your comment above on June 25th. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:56, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

June 2024 backlog drive
Cremastra (talk) 20:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)