User talk:MrStefanWolf

Discretionary sanctions alert for articles and content relating to post-1932 American politics
Please note that this refers to edits about the topic to any article, not just ones solely about American politics. Doug Weller talk 13:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

Cut it out
You may be new, but I'm sure I recall you've already been told of No personal attacks and WP:Civility. Regardless, you really need to cut this out [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Modern_architecture&diff=prev&oldid=863741786] or expect to be blocked. Nil Einne (talk) 19:16, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Modern architecture. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

~ ToBeFree I am not edit warring, I am just removing content without source and helping improve C quality article, I appreciate your concern and your kind message. Have a great day! MrStefanWolf (talk) 11:23, 15 October 2018 (UTC)