User talk:Mrazvan22

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compact (Romanian band) (April 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikiisawesome was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compact (Romanian band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Compact_(Romanian_band) Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wikiisawesome&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Compact_(Romanian_band) reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

wia (talk) 14:13, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Compact (Romanian band) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Compact (Romanian band), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:56, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Romania
With respect, the information you provided on your page is sourced but it is sourced WP:Puffery and not very useful when reading about the country's official provided stats. The economic growth rate is already provided and it is good. The rest, particularly about arts, math contributions etc. can be stated about any other large European country and is therefore redundant. Evidently this was based solely on Germany's article and not others as a whole. Also, there is no such phrase as a "fast developing country", only either lesser developed, developing or developed. Please see Manual of Style/Lead section for more info. Thanks. Oliszydlowski (talk) 05:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Hi! I understand your concern and thank you for the feedback! However, in the final paragraph of the lead, it's OK to highlight the aspects the country is doing well at. See e.g. last lead paragraphs in Uruguay, Croatia, Poland, Thailand. For example, in the article Peru, while the country faces some problems (e.g. crime, inequality), it's positive aspects that are highlighted in the last two lead paragraphs. Moreover, in certain articles, last lead paragraphs focus entirely on 1-2 aspects the country is doing well at, e.g. environmental policies for Costa Rica. So in Romania's case, I personally don't think it's WP:Puffery to highlight in the lead paragraphs key positive aspects the country is doing well, such as fast economic growth, IT sector and the educational system. The term fast-developing refers to economic growth rate, not to absolute level of GDP/GNI. Nevertheless, I agree the paragraph can be condensed further and written in a more objective way. I'd be more than happy to rephrase and converge with you to a format that you also agree on. Let me know what you think! Razvan Valentin Marinescu 14:41, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Pitești
Greetings. Please, create the collage. I look forward to seeing your work. Good luck. — Biruitorul Talk 17:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Perfect. How does the below look? And within the article in the Education section, I can replace the photo with I.C. Bratianu High-school (which will now exist in the photo collage) with a photo of the University of Pitesti, which might be more relevant as it's an institution of higher learning.
 * Sounds good so far. — Biruitorul Talk 06:32, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Not bad, but may I suggest one change regarding the Brătianu high school? As there’s no sense in repeating the same photo within the same article, let’s either put a photo of another relevant building in the education section, or replace it in the collage with that of another historic monument. — Biruitorul Talk 06:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds good. In the Education section, I tried replacing the photo with one of the University of Pitesti, but there is none on Commons. I was thinking of uploading the photo from this article: https://www.crescendo.ro/en/2010/11/18/european-money-invested-for-research-university-of-pitesti-success-story/, but I found it hard to trace it's copyright. Can we upload it with a CC BY license, or do we need to trace down the author and email them? Razvan Valentin Marinescu 15:54, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m guessing we would need permission. On Commons, unfortunately, the Zinca Golescu photos are not great, but we could use them if needed. There’s also this — not a significant school or building, but better than nothing. — Biruitorul Talk 17:35, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Or also this: https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fi%C8%99ier:RO_AG_-_Universitatea_din_Pitesti_(fostul_Institutul_Pedagogic).jpg .. I am currently traveling, but can look into it once I'm back. Otherwise, feel free to replace that photo with something else in the meantime. Razvan Valentin Marinescu 21:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to Corruption in Bulgaria you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 22:17, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you for letting me know, I didn't know! However, I'm not sure which section of the text you refer to. Also, how do you add the CC attribution? Do you add it in the commit description? Razvan Valentin Marinescu 00:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * You add it in article stace. You can add it . Or, there's a template at Template:Creative Commons text attribution notice. — Diannaa (talk) 01:20, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:10, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Hello, I'm Yoshi24517. I noticed that in this edit to Bulgaria, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Yoshi24517 ( Chat ) ( Very Busy ) 20:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)