User talk:Mrflip

Orphaned non-free image File:Big Bear &#39;Doin Thangs&#39; Album Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Big Bear &. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Richard M. Fierro


The article Richard M. Fierro has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 06:13, 22 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Richard M. Fierro for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard M. Fierro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Richard M. Fierro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. WWGB (talk) 05:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * User:Iamreallygoodatcheckers, jp Fifty-one minutes after you created the Joseph Fierro article, "Iamreallygoodatcheckers" became the first other User to post to it, and proposed that it be deleted. Many others quickly weighed in, supporting that recommendation. Your creation consisted of a bit over 1,000 characters. That deletion banner may have deterred other Users from posting to it, thinking their efforts might be quickily erased, but I felt the stub article was very worthy and should be kept and expanded: A minority of one to the deletion request. After a few others posted to it, doubling it in size, I doubled it once again, to four times the size you'd posted. The Springs mayor, the Colorado Governor and Biden in a personal call to Fierro, praised him. Still, there has been a torrent of right wing posters to nationwide social media claiming that Fiero is a "faggot," a "pedophile," and that there really weren't any killings, that it's all just more "fake news," Hopefully, "checkers" will reconsider that label he or she gave it that would deter other editors from expanding the stub, fearing it would be a waste of their time. I have a thousand other things I should be doing, but I hope you had a Happy Thanksgiving. Activist (talk) 03:01, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much for your work as mod/editor and for standing up for the article. I will trust the process that the redirect is the right decision, there's enough meat there to pay tribute to his actions Mrflip (talk) 22:14, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)