User talk:Mshake3/Archives/2007/August

CM Punk indy image
Do you know which federation this image was taken in or who his opponent is behind him? It would make for a better subtitle explanation. –– Lid(Talk) 01:15, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * I assumed you took the picture however the description page didn't list who his opponent was so I was hoping you could tell me. –– Lid(Talk) 01:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Found the results here, it was his trainer Danny Dominion. –– Lid(Talk) 01:37, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * There wasn't heat per-se between Punk and Dominion, there was heat between Dominion and the Chicago wrestling scene. Dominion had managed to piss off tonnes of promoters and people affiliated with him were shunned as a result leading to Punk stating, in 2003, he wouldn't tell people he was trained by Dominion due to a stigma his name brought on. –– Lid(Talk) 01:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

Here's the thing
I offered you a compromise since we both have evidence of the title's name. You refused to accept it so now we're back to square one. You're more than welcome to go back to the compromise. Or better yet, do what you always do when you don't agree with something. Take it to WP:PW. Lets form a consensus shall we?-- bullet proof  3:16 00:56, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
 * No worries. -- bullet proof  3:16 00:17, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * You ARE totally welcome. Happy Editing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:27, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

The burden
The burden is on you, Mshake3, to prove that the name of the title was what you say it was, not on me to prove it wasn't. You are the only one who has a problem with the way things are now. If the name of the title was what you say it was, then persuade other members to believe you. The reason no one else has replied is because they're tired of the same "suggestions" coming from you to split things up and make a mess of things. If the only who has replied on the tagline debate is a random IP, its because its just not worth the time of other editors to reply at such a pointless discussion. If a tagline was used, regardless of where or the number of times, it still warrants its own mention in the article. It’s no less notable than other taglines in articles. I've stated my case time and time again and quite frankly, I'm getting tired of these discussions too. So since no one seems to care enough to reply to your "suggestions", the burden is on you to make someone care.-- bullet proof  3:16 16:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Follow your own advice and stop reverting. Again, here's the dispute from a few months ago. Everything I needed to say was said there. --  bullet proof  3:16 16:40, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Sean O'Haire
Ok I've added the photo to the article, and thank you very much for getting a free licensed image for the article ! :)

One little thing though, I asume you took this photo yourself, but please state so clearly on the image page. It's just that people will often upload images they do not have the rights to, so the policy is to delete images where the source of an image is not stated (a simple "I took this photo" or something to that effect will suffice for self taken images (if someone else took it you need to say who and comfirm that they have agreed to release it under the license you tagged it with)). So it's better to err on the side of caution with these things. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 06:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Reply
The tag titles? Yeah since it wouldn't make a difference. The WCW title? Nope since World Championship would cause it to be confused with the current WHC. Today it is still widely known as the WCW World Heavyweight Championship. -- bullet proof  3:16 19:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

Rob Van Dam's European Title reign
Hi. I just thought I would let you know that while he isn't listed as a European Champion on WWE.com's title history page, he is listed as one on his WWE.com profile. It's confusing because there are conflicting issues here from the same website, so should we list him as a champion or keep it removed? - Deep   Shadow  04:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)