User talk:Mshake3/Archives/2007/July

Comment
(This is in response to your comment about taglines). I would do that, but I'm tired of reverting and re-adding this content, as it does no good. The Wrestling project is simply a joke. If you want to discuss this more, email me if you want. RobJ1981 11:16, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * In his latest edit summary here: TNA_Victory_Road: Tagline will go eventually, but I won't touch it yet. Basically a threat of future editing, which is pretty stupid and a bit uncivil in my opinion. RobJ1981 21:29, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I noticed the King of the Ring link dispute (and made 1 revert so far). Lots of blue links isn't helpful, and I noticed you left a link for TJ already about the past discussion (which he seemingly ignored for no reason that I see). Linking the same thing over and over serves no useful purpose, and TJ shouldn't be ignoring this. I think I might need to bring this up to an admin, if he continues to re-link King of the Ring in the next few days. Much like an article with too many redlinks: too many blue links makes it look messy as well, in my opinion. RobJ1981 04:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Listing who is on the DVD cover?! That's a bit of a joke. If I have the time I'll remove that information from articles. It seems like fancruft that only TJ Spyke seems to want in the articles. TNA articles shouldn't have it either. RobJ1981 20:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup, it should be promotional poster listed, not DVD cover (in my opinion at least). However, in movie articles: they have one or the other (not both I don't think). Some kind of policy should be made about this, but frankly I doubt it will get made. RobJ1981 22:46, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

WWE Vengeance
We are both right at the 3RR line, so let's discuss this on the talkpage of the PPV (rather than either of us getting banned by reverting again). TJ Spyke 00:51, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * It was the WCW championship at the time, check out the Vengeance 2001 results from WWE.com here, and the WCW title history here. Also, if you look at the World Heavyweight Championship History here, you'll see that Triple H was the first World Heavyweight Champion, when Eric Bischoff handed him the title to be exclusive to RAW, when Brock Lesnar (WWE champion at the time) decided to stay exclusive to SmackDown! Even if they referred to the title as the World Heavyweight Championship on the tape, it is a completely different title with a completely different lineage, and should not refer to it as that here as it confuses people. Bmg 916 Speak 03:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * As for the people getting confused, I understand your point, however, you could've worded it nicer. But I realize I have partially stuck my foot in my mouth over this issue, and for that I apologize. It is a bit of revisionist history I guess, but when The Rock won the title it was the WCW title, so when The Alliance was dissolved, is that when it turned into the "World Championship"? or was it when Jericho won the title at Vengeance 01? I guess I'm confused on that exact point. Bmg 916 Speak 19:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yea, I read at onlineworldofwrestling, and then reverted myself. I apologize. Bmg 916 Speak 19:51, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

TNA Victory Road
The match tagline is already mentioned (in this "Match of Champions"). Besides, the line listing the wrestlers is only for the wrestlers/match type/titles on the line and it's just a regular tag team match (match of champions is a tagline, not match type). IMO, the current wording is fine since it mentiones the tagline and doesn't imply that "Match of Champions" is an actual match type. Please rely if you disagree, instead of reverting. TJ Spyke 20:32, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wmx8hhh.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wmx8hhh.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 03:14, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

God I missed you
I really did Mshake3. Screenshots do count btw...-- bullet proof  3:16 04:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yeah he's right. The Light Heavyweight Championship became inactive before the WWF/WWE name change.-- bullet proof  3:16 03:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * A name change is a name change. -- bullet proof  3:16 03:42, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * From what?-- bullet proof  3:16 17:26, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

ATH for Deletion?
Thought you'd be interested in this, since i've seen you make a good amount of edits on the Around the Horn page. Articles_for_deletion/Around_the_Horn Bjewiki 01:24, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:ColtCabana.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ColtCabana.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 00:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:MichaelWuertz.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:MichaelWuertz.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:MichaelWuertz.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:MichaelWuertz.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:DominoWWE.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:DeuceWWE.jpg. The copy called Image:DeuceWWE.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 00:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Re:Draft

 * Ok then, that's good to know. Thanks. Gavyn Sykes 03:44, 17 July 2007 (UTC)