User talk:Murkus69

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Murkus69! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! JBchrch (talk) 22:03, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Thank you and sorry for Bernie Madoff. I'm a German and mostly work on German Wikipedia. Perhaps I should be more careful as I don't know all special rules of English grammar. Murkus69 (talk) 22:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Murkus69, I am sorry, but reading your message above and your contributions, it looks to me like you don't have a sufficient level of English to copyedit Wikipedia, like you are doing.

  • [1]. You need to capitalise the J ("Jewish") when writing about religions and nationalities.
  • [2]. There should be a comma between In 2005 and she. The structure of this sentence looks like it is copied from German, and it doesn't work as well in English.
  • [3]. Not only are the words here necessary for the sentence to work in English, the edit summary is wrong (two word too much -> two word too many).
  • [4]. The word read is perfectly acceptable in this context.
  • [5]. Again: it looks to me like you are using German syntax. In English, the structure of the previous sentence worked better.
  • [6] This not an error in the translation, this is a perfectly acceptable way to phrase this sentence in English. Also, in English, adverbs usually come before the verb, so I don't really understand why you would change the position of sexually here.

I hope you understand and I advise you to come back to enwiki once your English skills will have improved. JBchrch (talk) 08:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Murkus69, you really need to reconsider your involvement with enwiki. 20 min after I posted my message above, you introduced yet another error, by writing begining instead of beginning [7]. Also, you substantially changed the meaning of the sentence and worsened its style, and I am not sure whether this was intentional on your part. JBchrch (talk) 19:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I won't work on English articles any more, except I find contents which are obviously wrong. And there's still a lot to do in Wikipedia Germany. Murkus69 (talk) 19:45, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]