User talk:N-HH

Notification
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Soapbox Sam and HenryGarden1000
Because you posted on the talk pages of both of these editors, and queried whether they were the same person, I'm sending you this link to an SPI I just opened about them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
 * This is literally everything that's wrong with Wikipedia in one example from one editor: opening a deletion page for one of the oldest and best-known wineries in Spain, with a 150-year history, while diving in to argue *against* deleting a pointless, partisan gossip page about an ephemeral political "controversy" based ultimately on one Daily Mail report misrepresenting a one-off event five years after everyone else had long since forgotten about it. Absolute fuckwittery and pathetic and transparent political point-scoring at the same time.  N-HH  talk / edits  22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)