User talk:NW036

Direct flights
The only direct flights we list are international services with no plane change. For example, the kangaroo route or BA's IAH-ORD-LHR service. FCYTravis 20:16, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Discontinued service
Hey NW036- you should probably bring the "discontinued service discussion" at the discussion page for WP:Airports...I think color="blue">23 22:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * p.s. : nice user page ;) Sox 23 22:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 * no prob- I actually copied it from someone else too...lol...but anyways I created the Discontinued Service section in the discussion section of WP:Airports so feel free to give your 2 cents. (It's basically the same argument as the SEA article) Sox 23 23:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Aviation WikiProject Newsletter
The March 2007 issue of the Aviation WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 17:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, NW036! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:02, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Incident at Tedius Zanarukando's userpage
Anonymous user 66.38.164.40 has reportedly vandalized my userpage by flipping the Likes and Dislikes sections with the intent of inversion of my opinion. That has angered me. I have just reverted those edits by the anonymous user. That user should not be allowed to edit my userpage again. Decimus Tedius Regio Zanarukando 00:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Midwest Airlines at PIT
LOL- thanks for catching the mistake...I knew something wasn't right when I went to the Midwest page and MCI-PIT was still scheduled. I'm just gettin ahead of myself ;) Sox 23 23:58, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Pittsburgh International Airport
It looks like you have put much work into Pittsburgh International Airport and in my opinion it meets B-class article criteria. After the Review is complete I would nominate it for a GA-class article. If you have any questions visit my Talk Page. Marcusmax 23:20, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Just finished my official review, it can be found on the Aviation Review page. Marcusmax 02:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I awarded Pittsburgh International Airport B status, it now meets full criteria. I think you should nominate it for GA now. Marcusmax 20:25, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

I am blake
i must have edited my page w/o logging in —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.58.216.90 (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Former routes
Hey NW036 - I notice that you mentioned some airport talk pages that say Former Routes has been decided to not be useful - I searched, but can't find those discussions. I'd like to remove former routes from the San Francisco International Airport article, and would like those discussions as justification. Thanks! (You can reply on this page, it'll be on my watchlist) --Matt 15:50, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It was never given a final answer, but it was generally agreed that it is rather unhelpful at the following link: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive6 After looking at SFO's page I agree that it should be removed and will make the article much less cluttered. NW036 22:57, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Also noted on Sea-Tac's page NW036 22:59, 9 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Ok, thanks! I appreciate the links. --Matt 23:03, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * By the way, there's another discussion about it at Talk:San Francisco International Airport, so I invite you to give your opinion there too. Thanks --Matt 11:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for actually removing many of the sections - I was in flight when consensus was reached! --Matt 04:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

RDU Previous airline/destination removal
You stated that according to WP:airports, the huge amount of information that I collected about Previous Airlines and their destinations were removed. I looked over WP:Airports and I saw no discussion over that information and I saw nothing remotely close saying not to include it. So, could you either:

1. show me exactly where it was discussed not to include such information 2. please undo your delete 3. add the information as a new page that list "Previous airlines and destinations" because I believe that information is important to the airport as a part of it's history.

Kacey 11:24, 11 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Okay, I found it once I posted the article. The fact is all the information from the RDU page is thoroughly searchable on the internet and can be found there (as, in fact, this is where I found the information).  I would like to suggest option 3 above as in fact some people do find this information useful.  It's important to know where service once was served as a point of reference.

Kacey 11:28, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Previous Service
Hey NW036- in regards to the removal of previous service at the SAN page, I for some reason like how it fits into the article. As there is a "current service", "future service", and "previous service". I do agree with you that it is very lengthy and sloopy so I would suggest maybe a cleanup of the section. Also, the previous airlines section in that article also has an explanitory paragraph in the beginning rather than just simply listing all of the previous carriers. I don't know. I'm indifferent to the section on that page...If you need anything else I'm here Sox 23 21:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

History of Pittsburgh is an FAC
Thank you for taking the time to pass History of Pittsburgh as a GA. Since you are already familiar with the article, I wanted to point out that History of Pittsburgh is now an FAC. If you have time, could you please give a review? Thanks! PadreNuestro 01:50, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

PIT pics
Hey. I just got your list of pics you would like to get from the airport. I will see what I can do. I will take my camera to work today. It will be alot slower today then normal becuase its a Saturay but I will try and do my best. If you want, feel free to add me on AIM if you have it... screenname: howyfeldersnatch

luketenley

American Airlines
Hello NW036, I am a 757-767 Captian for AA. I will be doing some work on AA's main page and their destinations. I will also be doing some work on Port Columbus International Airport's main page and I already have, I live in Columbus, Ohio. I am based at LAX. Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.145.151.161 (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2007 (UTC).

NWA/SEA
NWA Focus City - SEA Talk Page - It's just a little discussion on the SEA Talk Page. Sox 23 20:13, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for catching my spelling mistakes
Thanks for catching all my spelling mistakes. I was typing that real fast plus it was alot to type out. Do you have AIM??

luketenley

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Bwe.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Bwe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

787 rude comment
I went over to tell the person with the rude comment that his/her action was unwarranted and I saw that you had already been to his/her talk page. I wanted to thank you for that. Marcus--Bangabalunga 04:32, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Northwest Airlines Fleet Table
We are not listing codes. I have discussed this before. I've been editing the Northwest Airlines page for a while now. This is not the official Northwest Airlines page so there is absolutely no reason to list ANY codes. A normal reader wouldn't understand what those codes mean so don't list them.--Golich17 17:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
 * I support your edit, NW036, and reverted the edit by Golich17. This edit you made, as well as my revert, has now been reverted once again by this user.  Perhaps you would care to add your comments on the talk page for NW.  I am not aware of any consensus having been reached about not using the full aircraft model numbers.


 * The aircraft type is of encyclopedic interest; it is not a obscure code which few understand. It is in fact the actual aircraft model.


 * Adding this information does not take up any more space or require any more effort to analyze. For instance, if you don't care that the NW B747-451 was built for NW, you can just ignore the -451 and consider it a generic -400.  This information is useful when seeing which aircraft have migrated to other airlines at later points in their history.


 * Remember that Wikipedia is not limited to information which is of interest only to a "normal reader." Wikipedia also includes information of use to those who have greater knowledge of the subject. If you are in doubt of concept, refer to articles in the area of science, technology and medicine. Plenty of this information is written to higher standard than a "normal" reader would require. Reward 18:50, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Do you live in Pittsburgh? If not where in Pennsylvania?
I was curious.

Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!

I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
 * Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
 * Join our mailing list
 * Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com

Thanks and I hope you join up!  Cbrown1023   talk   04:03, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Then how come the Northwest flight from Detroit has not been changed then? And why not put "Saturdays only" the public deserves to know.

Need Help updating old Wikiproject Aviation stuff
Hello NW036, I think it is seriously time we start updating our old pages here at WikiProject Aviation. We need a new Collaboration of the month. Old Reviews need to be archived. And old Talk page comments need to be Archived. Feel free to help maintain WikiProject Aviation.Thanks Marcusmax 02:26, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:AIRMALL logo.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AIRMALL logo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 20:39, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

FCO on Northwest Airlines
It has been deleted again on NWA's destinations but I have readded it back. Bucs2004 02:16, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

PHL-CDG
Where are you guys getting that AF is ending their PHl-CDG and DL will be taking over? I went to Delta's website and the only nonstop flight from PHL-CDG is operated by Air France after March 31. I have also searched for PHL-CDG operated by Delta and still has the flights operated by AF after April 1. Cashier freak (talk) 04:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Also, AF 365/366 (PHL-CDG and CDG-PHL) is still operating on March 31 per AF's website. It is still bookable on their website. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 04:52, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Melbourne Airport A-class
Hello, I was wondering if you could take a quick look at this review. Even the smallest suggestion/comment is much appreciated. Thank You - Marcusmax ( speak ) 19:10, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

DL/NWA PIT
Hi NW036, Now that Delta and NWA have combined operations at PIT, should NWA still be listed as a seperate carrier there (It now operates from gate D82 and D84) or should it be lsited under DL? One IP merged the destinations together and making NWA no longer existant at PIT. Please correct my edit if necessary. Cheers! Cashier freak (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!
As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. -  Trevor  MacInnis   contribs  03:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

RDU Airport Page
Did you create the RDU airport page? I ask because I just created a page for the USO of NC, and I'd like to ask if you could put a link to our page on yours. I've added the RDU page to ours already. Thanks.Jsrawlinson (talk) 14:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Pittsburgh event for Wikipedia's tenth anniversary
Hi! Since you're listed as a Wikipedian in Pittsburgh, I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia Tenth Anniversary celebrations we're having in Pittsburgh on Saturday, January 15. During the daytime, we're going to be having a photo contribution drive where anyone can bring in their digital photos or prints and Wikipedians will teach people how to upload them and add them to articles, and maybe introduction to Wikipedia workshops as well. Then in the evening, we'll have fun at the Carson City Saloon. There will be free Wikipedia t-shirts and other goodies, as well. See the Pittsburgh meetup page for more details. I hope to see you there!--ragesoss (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject Pittsburgh
--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk 20:41, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Pittsburgh meetup
Pittsburgh Wikipedians are invited to a meet up on April 3, 2015. Meetup Pittsburgh


 *  Bfpage &#124;leave a message 20:16, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Republicairlineslogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Republicairlineslogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC)