User talk:NZMKZ

Article Selection

 * Canadian Immigrant Investor Program -- this is a shorter one, but it might work. Structural work needed but also more content. If you did this in conjunction with a more extensive revision, that would be fine
 * Gas heater - Sparse on content and citations. So let's avoid.
 * Chicken nugget - This one won't work because it is semi-protected and has a somewhat difficult history. Note that several other students from other classes have been involved. The semi-protected status just means you'll have an extra layer of vetting that you have to go through.
 * Neapolitan piastra -- also a short one.

You could pick one of the shorter ones (first or last in the list) but only if you do it in conjunction with a more extensive one. Maybe just pick up one from the available articles list? Etherfire (talk) 18:52, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

What about these articles?
After today's class, I had a better understanding of what I am supposed to be looking for. Thus, here are other articles that I thought would be better to work with.


 * Cats in ancient Egypt
 * Bird food
 * Narmer
 * Crème brûlée

What do you think professor? I have already chosen the coffee cake article for editing. NZMKZ (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, NZMKZ, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:16, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello NZMKZ, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Rowing have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. ''I removed a close paraphrase of http://www.bbc.co.uk/oxford/culture/2004/02/henley_museum/history_rowing.shtml. Please be sure to write using your own words, thanks.'' Thank you. IamNotU (talk) 11:09, 7 September 2019 (UTC)